Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic cyst excision and hepaticojejunostomy for choledochal cyst in children: a

Hyunhee Kwon1, Jung-Man Namgoong2, Dae Yeon Kim1

  • 1Division of Pediatric Surgery, Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.

Surgical Endoscopy
|February 26, 2025
PubMed

Insights

Robot-assisted surgery for pediatric choledochal cysts offers improved anastomotic quality and faster recovery compared to laparoscopic surgery. While operative time is longer, robot-assisted surgery reduces anastomotic leak rates significantly.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Innovation

Background:

  • Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is standard for pediatric choledochal cysts (CC).
  • Laparoscopic (LA) and robot-assisted (RA) approaches are utilized.
  • Long-term outcomes require comparative analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Compare long-term outcomes of LA versus RA for pediatric CC.
  • Utilize propensity score matching (PSM) to minimize bias.
  • Evaluate operative time, complications, and recovery.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 159 pediatric patients (June 2008-December 2020).
  • Propensity score matching created 63 matched pairs (RA vs. LA).
  • Comparison of operative time, complication rates, and post-operative recovery.

Main Results:

  • RA group had longer operative time (359 vs. 319 min, p=0.006).
  • RA group showed significantly lower anastomotic leak rates (0% vs. 7.9%, p=0.023).
  • No significant differences in conversion, hospital stay, or severe complications; faster feeding initiation in RA.

Conclusions:

  • Robot-assisted surgery enhances anastomosis quality and security in pediatric CC.
  • Faster bowel movement recovery observed with RA.
  • RA presents a valuable alternative for pediatric choledochal cyst treatment.
Abstract