Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
Published on: November 10, 2010
Unpredictable singleton distractors in visual search can be subject to second-order suppression
Brandi Lee Drisdelle1,2, Alon Zivony3,4, Martin Eimer4
1School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Beacon House, Queens Road, Bristol, BS8 1QU, UK. brandi.drisdelle@bristol.ac.uk.
Visual search performance improves by suppressing salient distractors. This study shows that second-order suppression of unpredictable distractors is possible when feature variability is high, challenging previous findings.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Visual Perception
Background:
- Attentional capture by salient distractors can impair visual search.
- Previous research suggested suppression of distractors was limited to predictable features (first-order suppression).
- The possibility of second-order suppression for unpredictable distractors remained unclear due to conflicting evidence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the conditions under which second-order suppression of salient distractors in visual search is effective.
- To re-evaluate previous findings on suppression limitations by manipulating feature variability.
- To demonstrate that second-order suppression can be applied to unpredictable distractors.
Main Methods:
- A multiframe letter-probe paradigm was used to measure performance in visual search tasks.
- Experiments manipulated the predictability and variability of distractor and target features (color).
- Observer performance was assessed by the frequency of reporting probe letters at distractor locations.
Main Results:
- A singleton suppression effect was observed when target and distractor colors were constant (Experiment 1).
- No suppression effect was found when target and distractor colors were swapped randomly (Experiment 2).
- A robust suppression effect reappeared when target and distractor colors had high variability (eight random colors) (Experiment 3).
Conclusions:
- First-order suppression is not universally applicable.
- Second-order suppression of salient distractors is possible under conditions of high feature variability.
- Suppression effects are independent of direct target-distractor competition.
More Related Videos
08:45A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
Published on: December 5, 2014
05:58Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
Published on: August 29, 2018