Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Antigenic Liposomes for Generation of Disease-specific Antibodies
Published on: October 25, 2018
To test or not to test: Lessons learned from screening infants for peanut allergy
Emily Engelhardt1, Benjamin T Prince2, David R Stukus2
1From the Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
None:
Background: In recent years, there has been a trend to forgo screening for peanut allergy (PA), even in infants at high risk. This study aimed to better understand the implications of screening for PA before peanut introduction. Objective: We sought to characterize the outcomes of infants who underwent PA skin testing in a tertiary-care allergy clinic. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review between July 1, 2017, and December 31, 2020, on all infants seen in the allergy clinic who had a peanut skin-prick test and recorded their demographic and clinical characteristics as well as outcomes with regard to PA and tolerance. Results: Twenty percent of the infants screened were identified as having PA. Infants with a PA were more likely to be older at the time of testing, more likely to have another allergist-diagnosed immunoglobulin E (IgE) mediated food allergy, and more likely to have a prescription for a stronger (class VI or stronger) topical steroid. When conducted, oral food challenge was safe, with the majority of infants being treated with observation or antihistamines. A large percentage of infants with a PA developed tolerance during the follow-up period. Conversely, 5% of the infants who were initially tolerant developed a new PA. Conclusion: PA is associated with severe atopic dermatitis and other IgE-mediated food allergies. However, it is unclear if there is a benefit from screening infants before peanut introduction. It is important to monitor for resolution in the infant population.
Related Concept Videos
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null hypothesis and 'fail to...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

