Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
Published on: June 21, 2010
Student evaluations of teaching do not reflect student learning: an observational study
1Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine, Basseterre, Saint Kitts and Nevis. rogilbert@rossvet.edu.kn.
Student Evaluations of Teaching (SET) in veterinary medicine correlate positively with grades but negatively with actual learning. This suggests evaluations may not accurately reflect educational outcomes, urging cautious interpretation.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Education
- Educational Assessment
- Academic Evaluation
Background:
- Student Evaluations of Teaching (SET) are widely used for faculty and curriculum decisions.
- Existing evidence suggests SET can be biased by factors like student grades.
- The validity of SET in veterinary education, particularly concerning actual learning, remains under-examined.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the relationship between student evaluations of veterinary courses, student grades, and independent measures of learning.
- To determine if higher grades and favorable SET scores in veterinary medicine reflect genuine academic achievement.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine (RUSVM) from Fall 2018 to Summer 2022.
- Correlated course evaluations and student grades with scores from the external Veterinary Educational Assessment (VEA).
- Employed Spearman correlation coefficients to analyze relationships across 160 courses and 12 student cohorts.
Main Results:
- A significant positive correlation was found between mean course evaluations and median course grades (rho=0.35, P<0.0001).
- A similar positive correlation existed between mean course evaluations and the proportion of students earning A-grades (rho=0.38, P<0.0001).
- A statistically significant negative correlation was observed between course evaluations and VEA scores (rho=-0.18, P=0.02), indicating higher evaluations did not align with better learning outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Confirmed the established link between SET and student grades in veterinary education.
- Demonstrated a novel, albeit small, negative relationship between SET and an independent measure of learning in veterinary medicine.
- Advocates for cautious interpretation of SET, as their use in evaluating teachers or courses may lead to unintended negative consequences, such as lowered expectations for student achievement.
More Related Videos
10:43Eye-tracking Technology and Data-mining Techniques used for a Behavioral Analysis of Adults engaged in Learning Processes
Published on: June 10, 2021
13:44Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Surveys
Reliability and Validity
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Nursing Evaluation
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test