Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Dimensions of Health and Illness01:21

Dimensions of Health and Illness

7.0K
The factors influencing the health-illness continuum can be internal or external and may or may not be under conscious control. They are related to the following eight human dimensions, and each dimension is interrelated to one other.
7.0K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

181
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
181
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

4.9K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
4.9K
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II01:18

Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II

1.5K
The person's health status fluctuates continually, varying from being in good health to becoming ill and returning to being healthy. To understand the concept of illness prevention, there are two models. First, the health-illness continuum model is a graphic representation of an individual's wellness. It states that a person is considered healthy in the absence of physical disease and the presence of good emotional health.
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...
1.5K
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

54.8K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
54.8K
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern01:29

Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern

62
Assessing the gastrointestinal (GI) system is a complex process that begins with collecting subjective data. This data, collected through patient interviews, provides crucial insights into the patient's health history, perception patterns, and lifestyle habits, all contributing significantly to GI health.
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:
62

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction: Evaluating the implementation of integrated knowledge translation in a multi-country research consortium in Sub-Saharan Africa - a mixed methods comparative case study.

Implementation science : IS·2026
Same author

Intersectional inequalities in self-rated health in Germany across sex/gender, migration, education and income: a cross-sectional study.

Journal of epidemiology and community health·2026
Same author

Integrative Proteomic and In Silico Analysis of Perfluorooctanoic Acid Exposures in Primary Human Placental Cytotrophoblasts.

Environmental science & technology·2026
Same author

Ultraprocessed Food and Corporate Influence: Evidence, Regulation, and Policy Pathways to Address Chronic Disease in the United States.

American journal of public health·2026
Same author

Beyond Personal Responsibility: Lessons From the Tobacco War for Regulating Ultraprocessed Food.

American journal of public health·2026
Same author

Assessing governance structures for climate-resilient and sustainable health systems: development of the PHONIC framework.

Journal of global health·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2025

Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
09:33

Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India

Published on: December 23, 2022

2.1K

Development of the Navigation Guide Evidence-to-Decision Framework for Environmental Health: Version 1.0.

Nicholas Chartres1,2, Max T Aung3, Susan L Norris4

  • 1Program on Reproductive Health and the Environment, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143, United States.

Environmental Science & Technology
|February 27, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new framework for environmental health decisions, incorporating essentiality, human rights, and evidence quality. It aims for more transparent and equitable interventions by considering environmental justice and feasibility.

Keywords:
Environmental JusticeEssentialityEvidence to Decision FrameworkHealth EquityRecommendationsRisk AssessmentRisk ManagementRule Making

More Related Videos

Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment
05:19

Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment

Published on: June 1, 2015

13.5K
A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
06:28

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants

Published on: August 26, 2018

5.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2025

Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
09:33

Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India

Published on: December 23, 2022

2.1K
Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment
05:19

Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment

Published on: June 1, 2015

13.5K
A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
06:28

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants

Published on: August 26, 2018

5.9K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Health Sciences
  • Public Health Policy
  • Risk Assessment

Background:

  • Environmental exposures from industrial pollution significantly impact human health, disproportionately affecting vulnerable communities.
  • Current policy frameworks for environmental health interventions often lack transparency and fail to consider crucial factors beyond direct risk.
  • Existing decision-making processes neglect essentiality, health equity, and the distribution of benefits and costs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a structured and transparent framework for environmental health decision-making.
  • To incorporate a broader range of scientific information and factors into policy recommendations.
  • To enhance the equity and health-protective nature of environmental interventions.

Main Methods:

  • Developed the Navigation Guide Evidence-to-Decision Framework for Environmental Health (E2DFEH).
  • Reviewed existing evidence-to-decision frameworks.
  • Engaged 30 experts from 25 organizations in an iterative consensus process.

Main Results:

  • The E2DFEH framework includes three Foundations: Essentiality, Human Rights, and Quality of Evidence.
  • It also incorporates three core Criteria: Environmental Justice, Maximizing Benefits and Reducing Harm, and Sociocultural Acceptability and Feasibility.
  • The framework promotes transparency and comprehensiveness in decision-making.

Conclusions:

  • The E2DFEH provides a structured approach to environmental health decision-making.
  • It ensures explicit consideration of factors crucial for equitable and health-protective interventions.
  • This framework aims to improve the development and implementation of environmental health policies.