Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2025

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Development of the Clinical High Risk for Psychosis Services Fidelity Scale (CHRPS-FS) for Team-Based Care
Mark Savill1, Lindsay M Banks1, Briana T Sepulveda1
1Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, Sacramento (Savill, Banks, Sepulveda, Tryon, Nye, Asbun, Ereshefsky, Hayes, Niendam); Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (Ho, Blay, Carlson, LaCross); Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (Addington).
Objective:
This study aimed to develop and pilot the Clinical High Risk for Psychosis Services Fidelity Scale (CHRPS-FS).
Methods:
A literature review was conducted to identify evidence-based treatments for individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHRP). These findings were compared with the First-Episode Psychosis Services Fidelity Scale (FEPS-FS). Common items were retained, and others were added, modified, or deleted. Next, the Delphi process was conducted with 17 clinical and academic experts in CHRP care to determine consensus on the importance and validity of each item. Concurrently, the preliminary tool was piloted in eight coordinated specialty care (CSC) clinics serving individuals with CHRP.
Results:
The literature review identified two components of CHRP care that were not detailed in the FEPS-FS and were added to the CHRPS-FS; furthermore, one FEPS-FS item was modified and six were removed. In the Delphi process, clinical and academic experts achieved a consensus of >80% in two rounds, with some changes in item wording and the addition of one item (stepped care approach). A CHRPS-FS assessment was successfully piloted in eight CSC clinics. The mean CHRPS-FS rating score was 3.96 (range 3.75-4.23), and the median proportion of items rated at good to high fidelity was 72% (range 66%-78%).
Conclusions:
The CHRP-FS is feasible to implement, has face validity based on expert consensus, can be completed in conjunction with a FEPS-FS assessment or alone, and captures variability across programs. The CHRPS-FS measures service delivery and is suitable for clinical trials, learning health care systems, and quality improvement efforts.
Related Concept Videos
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-I
Physicians
The physician's primary responsibility is to diagnose illness and direct the medical or surgical treatment of the condition. The authority to admit patients to a healthcare agency or institution and practice care within that setting is granted to physicians by the healthcare agency or institution...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Restorative Care
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...
Psychological and Sociocultural Causes of Schizophrenia
Obedience

