Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2025

Detection of Cell-Free DNA in Blood Plasma Samples of Cancer Patients
Published on: September 9, 2020
Liquid Biopsy for Enhanced Specificity in Identifying Somatic Mutations in Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Large B-Cell
Gayaththri Vimalathas1,2,3, Oriane Cédile2,4,5,6, Marie Louise Grube Kjeldsen2,4
1Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Introduction:
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor biopsy is the current mainstay of genotyping, but is limited by its invasiveness and tumor heterogeneity. Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) constitutes a minimally invasive alternative that may better capture tumor-derived profiles from circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). This study compares the performance and genomic concordance of cfDNA and FFPE tumor DNA in aggressive non-Hodgkin large B-cell lymphoma.
Methods:
Paired diagnostic FFPE tissue and plasma samples from 15 patients were sequenced with a custom 53-gene panel.
Results:
Detection thresholds were empirically guided at 1% variant allele frequency (VAF) for cfDNA and 10% for unpaired FFPE DNA. The median number of cfDNA variants was 6 (interquartile range (IQR): 2-11) versus 63 (IQR: 15-250) in FFPE DNA at 1% VAF. Collectively, 102 somatic variants were shared between cfDNA and FFPE DNA with a median of 5 (range: 0-23). cfDNA showed a five-fold lower median VAF for shared variants than FFPE DNA (7% vs. 36%, p < 0.0001). Eighty percent of patients harbored at least one cfDNA variant. A maximum cfDNA recall rate of 83% was observed at FFPE DNA VAF > 50%. COSMIC database overlap was twice as high for cfDNA compared to FFPE DNA (22% vs. 11%) at 10% VAF.
Conclusion:
cfDNA has superior specificity for somatic mutation detection but lower sensitivity than FFPE DNA. Modest concordance was demonstrated between the two compartments. Our results support a complementary role of ctDNA in mutational profiling at a 1% VAF threshold in a pragmatic and clinically applicable setup.
More Related Videos
10:35A Blood-based Test for the Detection of ROS1 and RET Fusion Transcripts from Circulating Ribonucleic Acid Using Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction
Published on: April 5, 2018
07:17Author Spotlight: Advancing the Detection of Low-Frequency Mutations in Cancer Tissues
Published on: August 23, 2024