Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2025

MRI-guided Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy for Patients with Medically-refractory Essential Tremor
Published on: December 13, 2017
Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation Versus Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound in Tremor Patients: A
Christian Rainer Baumann1,2, Andreas Fleisch1,2, Sujitha Mahendran1,2
1Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Background:
Bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) and unilateral magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS), with potential future second-side treatment targeting the thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM), are currently the two best-established interventions for pharmaco-resistant tremors, but treatment selection is hampered by the lack of comparative evidence.
Objective:
To provide the first direct within-center and within-surgeon comparison between bilateral VIM-DBS and unilateral VIM-MRgFUS, applying consistently timed and elaborated efficacy and safety assessements.
Methods:
In this retrospective study, we included patients having received bilateral VIM-DBS (n = 30) or unilateral VIM-MRgFUS (n = 52) performed by one single neurosurgeon between 2014 and 2022. Efficacy was primarily measured by the improvement of the Washington Heights-Inwood Genetic Study of Essential Tremor scale in the more affected hand at 6 months. Regarding safety, we compared treatment-, procedure-, and hardware-related adverse events (AEs), graded by impact on activities of daily living (ADLs), and serious AEs (SAEs), retrospectively defined based on prolonged/repeated hospitalizations or persistent symptoms affecting ADLs.
Results:
We found equivalent tremor reduction in the more affected hand (DBS: 62.4% [41.3-87.9] vs. MRgFUS: 69.4% [42.4-77.7]; P = 0.958), but contralateral and axial tremors improved only with bilateral DBS. DBS was associated with a higher rate of procedure- and hardware-related AEs (17% vs. 2%; P = 0.023) but a nonsignificantly lower rate of persistent treatment-related AEs affecting ADLs at 6 months (7% vs. 13%; P = 0.343). Overall, the rates of SAEs (23.3% vs. 19.2%; P = 0.779) and persistent deficits affecting ADLs at 6 months (10% vs. 13%; P = 0.82) were similar.
Conclusions:
Despite distinct safety profiles, both interventions produced a similar burden of AEs. Tremor control was equivalent on the more affected side, whereas contralateral and axial tremors improved only after bilateral DBS. © 2025 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
More Related Videos
14:14Targeting Neuronal Fiber Tracts for Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy Using Interactive, Patient-Specific Models
Published on: August 12, 2018
10:15Utilizing Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Improve Language Function in Stroke Patients with Chronic Non-fluent Aphasia
Published on: July 2, 2013