Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2025

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
Published on: December 6, 2024
From RAGs to riches: Utilizing large language models to write documents for clinical trials
Nigel Markey1, Ilyass El-Mansouri2, Gaetan Rensonnet2
1Boston Consulting Group, London, UK.
Large language models can draft clinical trial protocols, but retrieval-augmented generation significantly improves their logic and references, making them more useful for drug development.
Area of Science:
- Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Research
- Natural Language Processing Applications
Background:
- Clinical trials necessitate extensive documentation, including protocols, consent forms, and study reports.
- Large language models (LLMs) show promise for accelerating the drafting of these essential documents.
- Concerns exist regarding the quality and reliability of LLM-generated content for clinical trial documentation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of off-the-shelf large language models in generating clinical trial protocol sections.
- To assess the impact of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) on improving LLM performance for clinical trial writing.
- To determine the practical usability of enhanced LLMs in addressing drug development bottlenecks.
Main Methods:
- Generated clinical trial protocol sections using an off-the-shelf LLM across various diseases and trial phases.
- Assessed generated sections on clinical thinking, logic, transparency, references, terminology, and content relevance.
- Implemented retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) by integrating accurate, up-to-date information, including regulatory guidance and ClinicalTrials.gov data.
- Regenerated protocol sections using the RAG-enhanced LLM and reassessed them using the same criteria.
Main Results:
- Off-the-shelf LLMs scored over 80% for content relevance and medical terminology but below 40% for clinical thinking, logic, and references.
- Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) significantly improved performance, increasing scores for clinical thinking, logic, and references to approximately 80%.
- RAG substantially enhanced the practical usability of LLMs for generating clinical trial-related documents.
Conclusions:
- Hybrid LLM architectures, such as RAG, demonstrate strong potential for clinical trial writing.
- RAG-enhanced LLMs can effectively generate various clinical trial documents, addressing key bottlenecks in drug development.
- This approach offers a potentially transformative solution for improving the efficiency of clinical research documentation.
More Related Videos
07:50A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
Published on: September 20, 2018
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Improving Translational Accuracy
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...