Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
Published on: December 24, 2015
Exploring Measurement Strategies for Identifying Multiple-Perpetrator Sexual Violence: Higher Prevalence Rates Than
RaeAnn E Anderson1,2,3, Erica L Goodman1, Frances G Eby1
1Department of Psychology, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota, USA.
Abstract:
Prior research suggests that multiple-perpetrator sexual violence (e.g., gang rape) is very rare-reported by less than 2% of individuals. However, these estimates may be outdated and biased by measurement. The goal of this study was to explore the prevalence of multiple-perpetrator sexual violence and ways to measure it. Data were aggregated across several studies that shared similar methodology in recruiting online, anonymous samples of adults (Table 1). Study 1 evaluated victimization across five samples of 2491 participants. Study 2 evaluated perpetration across four samples of 2699 participants. All participants completed questionnaires in a randomized order. Reported prevalence rates for victimization were higher than prior research (1.5%) and ranged between 2.8% and 10.9% (Table 2) with an average of 4.86% (see Table 3). Multiple-perpetrator victimization items were significantly correlated with other victimization items suggesting validity, phi = 0.182-0.371. Reported prevalence rates of perpetration ranged from 0.8 to 18.9% with an average of 6.43%. Multiple-perpetrator perpetration items were significantly correlated with other perpetration items, suggesting validity, phi = 0.190-0.582. Our findings suggest that multiple-perpetrator sexual violence is more common than previously suggested. Psychometric analyses suggest initial validity, utility, and acceptability for all examined measures that should be further investigated in primary data collections.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Prevalence and Incidence
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health...
Surveys
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...

