Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

151
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
151
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

123
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
123
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

111
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
111
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

79
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
79
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

117
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
117
Observational Studies01:11

Observational Studies

8.2K
Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
8.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

"We worked … as if nothing was happening": Exploring multilevel burnout experiences and resources among health professionals in the context of compounding disasters in Puerto Rico.

Psychological services·2026
Same author

Hallucinogen-Psychosis Associations Are Confounded by Baseline Psychiatric History.

The Journal of clinical psychiatry·2026
Same author

Adaptations to the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program for diverse clinical and cultural populations: a scoping review protocol.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Examining suicide literacy among emerging adult medical students in Puerto Rico.

Global mental health (Cambridge, England)·2026
Same author

Intertwined adversities: a mixed methods study of ACEs and migration trauma among Latinx immigrants.

Journal of behavioral medicine·2026
Same author

Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy: Breakthrough for Whom?

Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.2K

Equity-grounded implementation science: Comparative case analysis of three studies.

Gabriela A Nagy1, Eliut Rivera-Segarra2, Leopoldo J Cabassa3

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.

Psychological Services
|February 27, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Integrating health equity into implementation science is crucial for marginalized groups. This study presents "equity-grounded implementation science" with practical examples to reduce mental health disparities.

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.8K
Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.2K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.8K
Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.6K

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Implementation Science
  • Health Equity Research

Background:

  • Translating research into practice is challenging, particularly for marginalized populations.
  • Existing implementation science frameworks often lack concrete strategies for health equity integration.
  • Bridging the gap between theoretical calls for equity and actionable implementation strategies is needed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To illustrate a synergistic approach, termed "equity-grounded implementation science," combining health equity and implementation science.
  • To demonstrate practical methods for integrating health equity into implementation science through case examples.
  • To provide actionable solutions for reducing mental health inequities in historically marginalized communities.

Main Methods:

  • Presents three case studies focused on reducing mental health inequities in Latino and Black communities in the US and Puerto Rico.
  • Describes study aims, methodologies, settings, health equity elements, and implementation science aspects for each case.
  • Articulates how implementation science and health equity were bridged through community settings, co-designed interventions, and mixed-methods, community-engaged approaches.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrates how community settings, culturally relevant co-designed interventions, and community-engaged mixed methods can bridge implementation science and health equity.
  • Highlights the successful integration of health equity principles into implementation science practices.
  • Shows how to address key implementation outcomes in health equity studies.

Conclusions:

  • Equity-grounded implementation science offers a pathway to move from rhetoric to actionable solutions for health disparities.
  • The presented case examples provide practical guidance for researchers and practitioners.
  • This approach is vital for reducing mental health inequities in historically marginalized populations.