Factor Inhibitor Testing: An Update from Australasia/Asia-Pacific
Emmanuel J Favaloro1,2,3, Sandya Arunachalam4
1Department of Haematology, Sydney Centres for Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research (ICPMR), Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis
|February 27, 2025
Summary
Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitor testing shows high accuracy in detecting inhibitors, with over 99% of results correctly identifying their presence or absence. Most errors stem from data entry, not analytical issues.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Immunology
- Clinical Pathology
Background:
- Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors are antibodies targeting coagulation FVIII, reducing its activity.
- These inhibitors can arise in congenital hemophilia A (allo-antibodies) or acquired hemophilia A (auto-antibodies).
- Accurate FVIII inhibitor testing is crucial for patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the quality of FVIII inhibitor testing in a specific geographic region.
- To analyze recent external quality assessment (EQA) data from 2020-2024.
- To identify trends and potential areas for improvement in FVIII inhibitor diagnostics.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Program (RCPAQAP) FVIII inhibitor module.
- Analyzed results from over 80 participating laboratories over a 5-year period.
- Assessed performance based on the correct detection/non-detection of FVIII inhibitors in proficiency testing samples.
Main Results:
- >99% of participants correctly identified the presence or absence of FVIII inhibitors.
- Most interpretation errors were attributed to transcription or data entry, not analytical failures.
- Moderate coefficients of variation (25-40%) were observed for FVIII inhibitor titers, regardless of method (Bethesda vs. Nijmegen).
Conclusions:
- Laboratories demonstrate high proficiency in detecting FVIII inhibitors.
- Focus should be placed on minimizing data transcription and entry errors.
- While detection is accurate, variability in reported inhibitor titers warrants attention.


