Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Average Power01:13

Average Power

560
In practical electrical applications, the concept of time-varying instantaneous power is not frequently utilized. Instead, focus shifts to the more practical quantity known as average power. Average power is determined by integrating the instantaneous power over a specified time period and subsequently dividing it by that duration.
560
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

36
Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
36

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Anisotropic Black Phosphorus Synaptic Device for Neuromorphic Applications.

Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)·2016
Same author

An accurate clone-based haplotyping method by overlapping pool sequencing.

Nucleic acids research·2016
Same author

Upregulation of proangiogenic factors expression in the synovium of temporomandibular joint condylar hyperplasia.

Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology·2016
Same author

Synthesis and Applications of π-Extended Naphthalene Diimides.

Chemical record (New York, N.Y.)·2016
Same author

Observation of the Singly Cabibbo-Suppressed Decay D^{+}→ωπ^{+} and Evidence for D^{0}→ωπ^{0}.

Physical review letters·2016
Same author

Circular RNAs: a new frontier in the study of human diseases.

Journal of medical genetics·2016
Same journal

Reply to Comment on Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma Patients with Delayed Follow-Up.

American journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Comment on: "Safety and efficiency reducing retinopathy of prematurity guideline sensitivity: an external validation using a large US-based dataset".

American journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Reply to Comment on "Clinicopathological and Imaging Distinction Between Ocular Adnexal MALT Lymphoma and IgG4-Related Ophthalmic Disease".

American journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Comment on: Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma Patients With Delayed Follow-Up.

American journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Corneal sensitivity changes and nerve plexus abnormalities in noninfectious anterior uveitis.

American journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Role of Menopausal Hormone Therapy on Strabismus, Strabismus Surgery, and Reoperation Rates.

American journal of ophthalmology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2025

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler SLPS Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses
06:55

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler SLPS Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses

Published on: June 6, 2017

7.5K

Comparative Analysis of Eighteen IOL Power Calculation Formulas Using a Modified Formula Performance Index Across

Shan Ma1, Cheng Li2, Jing Sun3

  • 1From the Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases (S.M., J.S., J.Y., K.W., X.C., F.Z., and F.T.), Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China; Zhengda Guangming Eye Group (S.M. and X.S.), Weifang, China.

American Journal of Ophthalmology
|February 27, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Modern intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas like Cooke K6, PEARL-DGS, and Barrett TK show superior accuracy. Personalized formula selection based on patient biometry is crucial for optimizing refractive outcomes after cataract surgery.

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

10.8K
Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees
14:31

Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees

Published on: July 15, 2009

13.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2025

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler SLPS Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses
06:55

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler SLPS Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses

Published on: June 6, 2017

7.5K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

10.8K
Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees
14:31

Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees

Published on: July 15, 2009

13.9K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Optics

Background:

  • Cataract surgery requires precise intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation for optimal visual outcomes.
  • Numerous IOL power calculation formulas exist, but their performance varies across different patient biometries.
  • Evaluating formula accuracy is essential for refining surgical planning and patient satisfaction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the predictive accuracy of 18 different IOL power calculation formulas.
  • To assess formula performance across diverse ocular biometric parameters.
  • To identify the most accurate formulas and guide personalized IOL power selection.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective analysis of 213 cataract patients undergoing phacoemulsification with SN60WF IOL implantation.
  • Evaluation of 18 IOL power calculation formulas using the Formula Performance Index (FPI) and prediction error (PE) variability.
  • Subgroup analysis based on axial length, corneal curvature, and anterior chamber depth.

Main Results:

  • Cooke K6, PEARL-DGS, and Barrett TK demonstrated superior overall accuracy and lower prediction error variability compared to traditional formulas.
  • PEARL-DGS excelled in short eyes, Haigis in long eyes and steep corneas, Barrett TK in medium-long eyes and flatter corneas, and Cooke K6 in shallow anterior chambers.
  • Traditional formulas like Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T showed lower accuracy and higher PE variability.

Conclusions:

  • Modern IOL power calculation formulas offer improved accuracy and reduced prediction error compared to older methods.
  • Biometry-driven selection of IOL power calculation formulas is critical for optimizing refractive outcomes.
  • This study provides a clinical reference for personalized IOL power selection in cataract surgery.