Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2025

Protocols for Robust Herbicide Resistance Testing in Different Weed Species
Published on: July 2, 2015
New insight into Poa annua control with clethodim from the dose-response study using several grass species and ACCase
Kensuke Ohta1, Yoshinobu Jin2, Yoshinao Sada2
1Agro & Life Solutions Research Laboratory, Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd., Hyogo, Japan; Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Abstract:
Poa annua L., a widespread allotetraploid weed, possesses both Leu1781-resistant and Ile1781-susceptible ACCase genes. This study aimed to elucidate how P. annua is controlled by the ACCase inhibitor clethodim, despite its resistance to many other ACCase-inhibiting herbicides. We conducted whole-plant and enzyme-level dose-response assays on P. annua, resistant fescue species (Festuca rubra and F. brevipila) with only Leu1781-resistant ACCase, and susceptible species (Poa pratensis and Lolium multiflorum) with only Ile1781-susceptible ACCase. We also investigated the expression ratio of the two ACCase genes in P. annua. The enzyme assay revealed that P. annua's resistance was intermediate between susceptible and resistant species, with a double-sigmoid dose-response curve indicating a functional 50:50 ratio of resistant and susceptible enzymes, i.e., the activity of the susceptible enzyme dilutes that of the resistant enzyme, leading to reduced resistance (the so-called dilution effect). This ratio aligns with the gene expression levels. At the whole-plant level, clethodim was effective against P. annua, but not effective against two fine fescue species at the standard dose. P. annua's dose response fell between that of susceptible and resistant species, though leaning closer to the resistant fescues. Considering the enzyme assay results, the dilution effect may also be involved at the whole-plant level. In any case, the registered dose of clethodim can be redefined as the one controlling P. annua, being set close to its ED90 and located within the narrow margin of dose-response difference between the two grass groups.

