Incidence of Multiple Revision Cervical Surgeries After Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
- Wesley M Durand 1, Amir Human Hoveidaei 2, Micheal Raad 1, Rajan Khanna 1, Amit Jain 1
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- 2International Center for Limb Lengthening, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
- 0Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Revision rates after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) increase significantly with each subsequent surgery. Patients under 65 face over 40% risk of a third surgery after two prior revisions.
Area Of Science
- Spine surgery outcomes
- Cervical spine research
- Surgical revision epidemiology
Background
- The rate of revision surgery following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is documented, but data on multiple revisions is scarce.
- Understanding the cumulative risk of revision surgery is crucial for patient counseling and surgical planning.
Purpose Of The Study
- To determine the incidence of multiple revision cervical surgeries within five years of a primary, single-level ACDF.
- To assess the escalating risk of subsequent revisions after the first and second revision surgeries.
Main Methods
- Retrospective analysis of the MarketScan private insurance database (2010-2020).
- Inclusion of adult patients (≤65 years) undergoing primary, single-level ACDF, excluding infectious, traumatic, or neoplastic cases.
- Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, adjusting for relevant covariates.
Main Results
- A total of 42,845 patients were analyzed; 10.8% underwent a first revision, and 2.1% underwent a second revision within five years.
- The cumulative incidence of revision surgery at five years was 10.8% after primary ACDF, 24.1% after one revision, and 42.5% after two revisions.
- The risk of subsequent revision was significantly higher after one revision (HR 1.6) and markedly higher after two revisions (HR 2.6) compared to primary surgery.
Conclusions
- Approximately 10% of patients under 65 require revision surgery within five years of primary ACDF.
- The risk of further revision escalates substantially, with over 20% requiring a second revision and over 40% needing a third after two prior revisions.
- These findings are critical for informing patient decision-making regarding ACDF and potential repeat surgeries.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

