Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Pore-scale Imaging and Characterization of Hydrocarbon Reservoir Rock Wettability at Subsurface Conditions Using X-ray Microtomography
Published on: October 21, 2018
In situ error analysis in contact angle goniometry.
Heikki A Nurmi1, Gentrit Zenuni1, Sakari Lepikko1
1Department of Applied Physics, School of Science, Aalto University, Konemiehentie 1, Espoo, Finland. heikki.nurmi@aalto.fi.
Accurate surface wetting measurements using contact angle goniometry are crucial. This study introduces an in situ error estimation method to improve goniometer accuracy, revealing potentially larger errors than previously assumed.
Area of Science:
- Surface Science
- Metrology
- Instrumental Analysis
Background:
- Contact angle goniometry is vital for characterizing surface wetting properties across diverse fields like petrochemistry, coatings, and medicine.
- The accuracy of goniometer measurements is frequently unknown, with potential for significant errors that can invalidate results.
- Current error estimation methods often neglect instrumental uncertainties, relying solely on post-measurement data variance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate an in situ method for estimating intrinsic measurement errors in contact angle goniometry.
- To address the underestimation of errors in current goniometer analysis.
- To provide a tool for improving the reliability of contact angle measurements.
Main Methods:
- Development of a novel in situ error estimation technique for contact angle goniometry.
- Validation of the method against a commercial contact angle goniometer.
- Evaluation using synthetic droplet images with predefined contact angles.
Main Results:
- The proposed in situ method effectively estimates intrinsic measurement errors for each captured frame.
- Results indicate that measurement errors can be substantially larger than those typically estimated.
- The study highlights the critical need for in situ error assessment in goniometer applications.
Conclusions:
- The developed in situ error estimation method offers a more accurate assessment of goniometer measurement reliability.
- Implementation of this method can assist users in instrument tuning and data analysis.
- This approach enhances the trustworthiness of contact angle data in scientific and industrial applications.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Contact Angle
The adhesive force is the molecular force between molecules of different materials, that is, between the molecules of the solid and the liquid. The cohesive force...
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
Errors in Taping
Adjusting a Traverse

