Understanding caregiver preferences for firearm locking devices in a pediatric emergency department

Tyler Lennon1,2, Samaa Kemal3, Sanjana Shankar3

  • 1Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children'S Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. tlennon@mcw.edu.

Injury Epidemiology
|February 28, 2025
PubMed

Insights

Caregivers in pediatric emergency departments prefer gun safes for firearm storage. Providing preferred locking devices significantly increased safe storage practices, with all follow-up respondents reporting locked firearms.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Pediatric Safety
  • Firearm Injury Prevention

Background:

  • Approximately 40% of US households with children store firearms.
  • Child access to firearms in the home is a significant public health concern.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe firearm storage practices among caregivers of children in a pediatric emergency department (ED).
  • To identify caregiver preferences for firearm locking devices.
  • To evaluate the impact of providing preferred locking devices on safe storage behaviors.

Main Methods:

  • Cross-sectional survey of caregivers with firearms in the home presenting to a pediatric ED.
  • Inquiry into current firearm storage practices and locking device preferences.
  • Provision of preferred locking devices (cable lock, lock box, gun safe) to caregivers with unsafe storage practices, followed by a 30-day reevaluation.

Main Results:

  • Most caregivers (91%) had handguns; 41% reported triple safe storage.
  • Gun safes were preferred (40%) over cable locks (20%).
  • Caregiver preferences for locking devices were influenced by speed of access, device strength, and cost.

Conclusions:

  • Caregivers frequently use safes and prefer them when offered.
  • Providing preferred locking devices led to 100% of follow-up respondents reporting all firearms locked.
  • Healthcare and community organizations should align safe firearm storage initiatives with caregiver preferences.
Abstract