Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2025
Corneal Donor Tissue Preparation for Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty
Published on: September 17, 2014
Preoperative edema severity affects outcomes after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs endothelial
Maximilian Friedrich1, Hyeck-Soo Son1, Jasper Lind1
1Department of Ophthalmology, David J. Apple International Laboratory for Ocular Pathology and International Vision Correction Research Centre (IVCRC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Background:
In patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD), the most beneficial stage to perform Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) remains uncertain. The goal of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes after DMEK in FECD patients with subclinical corneal edema and clinical corneal edema to test the hypothesis of whether performing surgery in subclinical corneal edema stages achieves better surgical outcomes.
Methods:
In this prospective, observational, single-institution cohort study, 106 pseudophakic eyes of 85 patients with FECD were divided into two groups depending on the presence of preoperative subclinical and clinical corneal edema. Subclinical corneal edema was diagnosed if more than one of the following criteria was present in Scheimpflug tomography: loss of regular isopachs, displacement of the thinnest point of the cornea, and focal posterior corneal surface depression. Clinical corneal edema was diagnosed with slit-lamp biomicroscopy. The primary outcome was the corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) 4 months after DMEK. Secondary outcomes were central corneal thickness (CCT), thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), and total corneal density (TCD) in Scheimpflug tomography, as well as endothelial cell loss (ECL) and the re-bubbling rate. The differences between both groups were analyzed using clustered Wilcoxon rank-sum tests or a Chi-squared test.
Results:
Postoperative CDVA was significantly better in the group with subclinical edema (0.18 ± 0.12 logMAR) compared to the group with clinical edema (0.24 ± 0.19 logMAR; P = 0.026). Four months after DMEK, TCD was higher in the group with preoperative clinical edema [31.7 ± 8.3 gray scale units (GSU)] compared to the group with subclinical edema (27.8 ± 6.1 GSU; P = 0.005). The postoperative CCT, TCT, ECL, and re-bubbling rates did not differ significantly between both groups (all P > 0.05).
Conclusions:
DMEK for FECD yielded better visual acuity after 4 months when performed in the early stage of FECD compared to a later stage with clinical edema. This may be attributable to persistent corneal fibrosis after DMEK in eyes with preoperative clinically evident corneal edema, as suggested by higher postoperative corneal density in eyes with clinical edema. Consequently, the findings advocate for the consideration of earlier DMEK in FECD patients to achieve better surgical recovery.
