Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2025

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
Published on: May 27, 2020
Can ΔSCF and ROKS DFT-Based Methods Predict the Inversion of the Singlet-Triplet Gap in Organic Molecules?
Danillo Valverde1,2, Gaetano Ricci1, Juan Carlos Sancho-García3
1Laboratory for Computational Modeling of Functional Materials, Namur Institute of Structured Matter, University of Namur, Rue de Bruxelles, 61, Namur B-5000, Belgium.
Abstract:
Inverted singlet-triplet gap systems (INVEST) have emerged as an intriguing class of materials with potential applications as emitters in Organic Light Emitting Diodes (OLEDs). Indeed, this type of material exhibits a negative singlet-triplet energy gap (ΔEST), i.e., an inversion of the lowest singlet (S1) and triplet (T1) excited states, that goes against Hund's rule. In this study, the ΔEST of a set of 15 INVEST molecules has been computed within the framework of Restricted Open-Shell Kohn-Sham (ROKS) and Delta Self-Consistent Field (ΔSCF) methods and the results were benchmarked against wavefunction-based calculations performed at the EOM-CCSD, NEVPT2, and SCS-CC2 levels. We find that ROKS always (and wrongly) predicts a positive ΔEST with global hybrid, meta-GGA, and long-range corrected functionals and that this is almost functional-independent. We also show that the only way to obtain an inverted gap was to resort to double hybrid functionals. In contrast, using the above-mentioned functionals, ΔSCF usually gives a negative ΔEST, although the results are largely functional-dependent. Overall, applying a ΔSCF method based on the PBE0 functional provides the lowest MSD and MAD with respect to the EOM-CCSD results. We further show that the singlet-triplet inversion is driven by different degrees of orbital relaxation in the singlet versus triplet state and that this is well captured by ΔSCF calculations. As a matter of fact, this orbital relaxation in ΔSCF somehow mimics the involvement of double and higher-order excitations in EOM-CCSD, which leads to a difference in spatial localization of the α and β spins, and thus introduces (local) spin polarization effects sourcing the negative ΔEST. However, care should be taken when using the ΔSCF method to screen materials with potential INVEST behavior in view of their limited quantitative correlation with reference EOM-CCSD results on the molecular data basis used here.
Related Concept Videos
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
Predicting Molecular Geometry
IR and UV–Vis Spectroscopy of Aldehydes and Ketones
UV–Vis Spectroscopy: Woodward–Fieser Rules
Chemical Shift: Internal References and Solvent Effects
The internal reference compound generally used in NMR spectroscopy is tetramethylsilane (TMS). TMS is preferred because it is chemically inert, soluble in NMR solvents, and easily removable. Also, the highly shielded methyl protons in TMS yield an intense...
Inductive Effects on Chemical Shift: Overview

