Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Classical Conditioning in Daily Life01:17

Classical Conditioning in Daily Life

551
Classical conditioning, a fundamental principle of associative learning, explains various phenomena observed in daily life, such as fear development, the placebo effect, taste aversion, and drug habituation. These applications demonstrate the profound impact of associative learning on human behavior and physiological responses.
John B. Watson and Rosalie Rayner famously demonstrated the development of fear through classical conditioning in their experiment with Little Albert. They paired the...
551
Conditioned Taste Aversion01:14

Conditioned Taste Aversion

116
Conditioned taste aversion, also known as sauce béarnaise syndrome, is a phenomenon in which an individual develops an aversion to a certain food taste following a negative experience, typically illness. This form of aversion is a type of classical conditioning in which the taste of the food (conditioned stimulus, CS) is associated with the experience of illness (unconditioned stimulus, UCS).
A notable characteristic of conditioned taste aversion is that it often requires only a single...
116
Classical Conditioning01:18

Classical Conditioning

424
Associative learning, a core principle in behavioral psychology, involves forming connections between events and facilitating learned responses. This concept is vividly illustrated by classical conditioning, a process extensively studied by the Russian physiologist Ivan Pavlov. Pavlov's pioneering research on dogs' digestive systems led to the discovery that behaviors can be learned through association, laying the groundwork for classical conditioning.
Ivan Pavlov observed that dogs...
424
Real-World Application of Classical Conditioning01:15

Real-World Application of Classical Conditioning

505
Classical conditioning not only includes the initial pairing of stimuli but also extends to more complex forms, such as higher-order conditioning. Higher-order conditioning involves creating associations beyond the primary conditioned stimulus, resulting in a chain of conditioned responses.
Higher-order, or second-order, conditioning occurs when a neutral stimulus becomes associated with an already established conditioned stimulus through repeated pairings. For instance, if a dog has been...
505
Principles of Classical Conditioning01:23

Principles of Classical Conditioning

436
Classical conditioning, as described by Ivan Pavlov, is a foundational concept in associative learning, where a neutral stimulus becomes capable of eliciting a conditioned response through association with an unconditioned stimulus. The process of acquisition, where this learning occurs, and the subsequent phenomena of contiguity, contingency, generalization, discrimination, extinction, and spontaneous recovery are crucial for a comprehensive understanding of classical conditioning.
During the...
436
Associative Learning01:27

Associative Learning

276
Associative learning is a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology, wherein a connection is established between two stimuli or events, leading to a learned response. This process is critical in understanding how behaviors are acquired and modified. Conditioning, the mechanism through which associations are formed, can be divided into two main types: classical conditioning and operant conditioning, each elucidating different aspects of associative learning.
Classical conditioning, also known...
276

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Human cerebellum and ventral tegmental area interact during extinction of learned fear.

eLife·2026
Same author

Clinical telemonitoring and telerehabilitation of cognition in rare neurological diseases: a scoping review.

Journal of neurology·2026
Same author

Cerebellar Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in the Theta Band Prevents Recall of the Initial Fear Association After Extinction Training.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same author

A Severity-Agnostic Atrophy Pattern in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3: Volumetrics from ENIGMA-Ataxia.

Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society·2026
Same author

Cerebellar gray matter volume changes across development: Posterolateral and vermal transient increases during adolescence.

Behavioural brain research·2026
Same author

Timing Matters: Providing Contingency Instructions to Modify Fear Extinction Memories in Anxiety Disorders.

Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2025

Investigating the Neural Mechanisms of Aware and Unaware Fear Memory with fMRI
12:51

Investigating the Neural Mechanisms of Aware and Unaware Fear Memory with fMRI

Published on: October 6, 2011

12.8K

Appetitive and aversive classical conditioning: Self-reports and physiological responses.

Mykola Petrenko1, Lena Coenen1, Alice Doubliez1

  • 1Department of Neurology and Center for Translational Neuro, and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), Essen University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, Essen 45147, Germany.

Behavioural Brain Research
|March 1, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Physiological responses to appetitive stimuli were lower than aversive ones, but self-reports showed fewer differences in this associative learning study. Full comparability in behavioral outcomes between appetitive and aversive conditioning may not be achievable.

Keywords:
Appetitive stimuliAssociative learningAversive stimuliClassical conditioningPupil sizeQuestionnairesSkin conductance responseValence

More Related Videos

Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats
06:57

Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats

Published on: February 4, 2016

10.9K
Whisker-signaled Eyeblink Classical Conditioning in Head-fixed Mice
10:14

Whisker-signaled Eyeblink Classical Conditioning in Head-fixed Mice

Published on: March 30, 2016

12.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2025

Investigating the Neural Mechanisms of Aware and Unaware Fear Memory with fMRI
12:51

Investigating the Neural Mechanisms of Aware and Unaware Fear Memory with fMRI

Published on: October 6, 2011

12.8K
Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats
06:57

Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats

Published on: February 4, 2016

10.9K
Whisker-signaled Eyeblink Classical Conditioning in Head-fixed Mice
10:14

Whisker-signaled Eyeblink Classical Conditioning in Head-fixed Mice

Published on: March 30, 2016

12.9K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • Maladaptive associative learning underlies mental health disorders like anxiety, mood disorders, addiction, and chronic pain.
  • Neural mechanisms of appetitive and aversive conditioning overlap but are also distinct, necessitating direct comparisons.
  • Human studies often use monetary rewards as appetitive unconditioned stimuli (US), unlike animal models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare behavioral outcomes, specifically self-reports and physiological responses, in appetitive and aversive conditioning paradigms.
  • To investigate the extent to which behavioral recordings in these two types of conditioning tasks match.
  • To inform future neuroimaging studies by identifying potential discrepancies in response magnitudes and learning rates.

Main Methods:

  • Two studies were conducted with 40 healthy participants (20 women).
  • Study 1 compared self-reports and physiological responses (skin conductance, pupil size) to electric shock (aversive US) and monetary rewards (appetitive US).
  • Study 2 used differential aversive (electric shock) and appetitive (one Euro reward) conditioning, with randomized order, assessing conditioned stimuli (CS) and US responses.

Main Results:

  • Physiological responses were significantly lower for appetitive conditioned stimuli (CS) and unconditioned stimuli (US) compared to aversive CS and US (p < 0.001).
  • Self-reports showed fewer differences in response magnitude and differential CS responding between appetitive and aversive conditions.
  • Self-reported valence was higher for monetary rewards than for electric shock (p < 0.001).

Conclusions:

  • Full comparability between behavioral outcomes in appetitive and aversive conditioning paradigms may not be achievable due to diverging outcomes.
  • Differences in physiological responses versus self-reports highlight the complexity of comparing appetitive and aversive learning.
  • Future neurobiological studies comparing appetitive and aversive stimulus processing must account for potential differences in response magnitudes and learning rates.