Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2025

09:27
DNA Microarrays: Sample Quality Control, Array Hybridization and Scanning
Published on: March 15, 2011
37.9K
Making waves: Report your quality assurance and control (QA/QC) information when publishing analytical data.
Gretchen L Lescord1, Adam T Lepage2
1Florida LAKEWATCH & the School of Forest, Fisheries, and Geomatics Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Water Research
|March 2, 2025
Summary
Transparent quality assurance and control (QA/QC) reporting in quantitative analytical chemistry is crucial for aquatic sciences. This study provides eight recommendations to improve QA/QC reporting, enhancing data reliability and research impact.
Area of Science:
- Quantitative analytical chemistry
- Aquatic sciences
- Environmental monitoring
Background:
- Analytical chemistry data is vital for aquatic science research and waterbody management.
- Current scientific literature often lacks comprehensive quality assurance and control (QA/QC) reporting.
- Interdisciplinary researchers may benefit from explicit guidance on QA/QC practices.
Purpose of the Study:
- To inform interdisciplinary researchers about QA/QC theory and approaches in analytical chemistry.
- To provide actionable recommendations for effective QA/QC reporting in scientific publications.
- To emphasize the importance of QA/QC for the broader aquatic science community.
Main Methods:
- Review of QA/QC theory and common practices in analytical chemistry.
- Development of eight specific recommendations for QA/QC reporting.
- Analysis of current literature for examples of QA/QC reporting deficiencies and successes.
- Discussion of reporting detection limits and sample sizes.
Main Results:
- Identified consistent deficiencies in QA/QC reporting in recent aquatic science literature.
- Proposed eight recommendations for transparent and concise QA/QC summaries.
- Highlighted the importance of reporting detection limits and sample sizes.
- Presented positive examples of effective QA/QC reporting.
Conclusions:
- Improved QA/QC reporting enhances the reach, usefulness, and longevity of scientific data.
- Transparent QA/QC practices are essential for robust scientific research and data integrity.
- Adoption of these recommendations will benefit students, researchers, data managers, and editors.
Related Concept Videos
Quality Control
143
Quality control is one of the three cyclical quality assurance activities that help keep a system under statistical control. Typical quality control activities include creating quality control charts, conducting proficiency testing, and documenting and archiving results.
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
143
Quality Assurance
112
Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
112
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
5.2K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
5.2K
Data Validation
139
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
Key parameters for method validation include:
139
Statistical Analysis: Overview
5.6K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
5.6K
Review and Preview
8.8K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
8.8K

