Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Characterizing Dissipative Elastic Metamaterials Produced by Additive Manufacturing
Published on: June 28, 2024
Mechanical properties of 3D printed denture base polymers
Andrea Coldea1, Felicitas Mayinger1, John Meinen2
1Research Associate, Material Science Unit, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.
Mechanical testing reveals 3D printed denture base polymers exhibit lower flexural strength, elastic modulus, and hardness than injection molded materials. However, some 3D printed resins show superior fracture toughness and work of fracture.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Dental Materials Science
- Additive Manufacturing
Background:
- Limited data exists on the mechanical properties of 3D printed denture base polymers using standardized testing methods.
- Evaluating these properties is crucial for clinical application and material development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine flexural strength (σf), elastic modulus (E), fracture toughness (KIC), work of fracture (ωe), and Martens hardness (HM) of 3D printed denture base polymers.
- To compare these mechanical properties against an injection-molded control material.
Main Methods:
- Three additive manufacturing resins (Lucitone Digital Print, Flexcera Base, experimental) and one injection molding resin (IvoBase Hybrid) were analyzed.
- Specimens underwent fabrication, polishing, tempering, and thermal cycling before mechanical property testing.
- Statistical analysis included Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests and parametric/nonparametric pairwise comparisons (α=.05).
Main Results:
- 3D printed polymers showed significantly lower flexural strength (σf), elastic modulus (E), and Martens hardness (HM) compared to the injection-molded material, both before and after aging.
- Fracture toughness (KIC) and work of fracture (ωe) were highest for a specific 3D printed polymer (LDP) after aging, while others were comparable.
- The injection-molded material (IBH) was unaffected by artificial aging, unlike the 3D printed resins.
Conclusions:
- Printable denture base polymers generally exhibit inferior σf, E, and HM compared to conventional injection-molded materials.
- Certain 3D printed materials demonstrate competitive or superior KIC and ωe, suggesting potential for improved fracture resistance.
- Tension testing is recommended for evaluating ductile materials like these, alongside traditional bend tests.
More Related Videos
07:42Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
03:37Impact of Fabrication Techniques and Polishing Procedures on Surface Roughness of Denture Base Resins
Published on: January 17, 2025