Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

A General Method for Evaluating Deep Brain Stimulation Effects on Intravenous Methamphetamine Self-Administration
Published on: January 22, 2016
Perspectives of syringe services program operators in Michigan on their relationship with substance use treatment: a
Molly C Reid1, Samantha J Harris2, Suzanne M Grieb3,4
1Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. mreid35@jh.edu.
Background:
Substance use treatment (SUT) and harm reduction are often perceived as having distinct goals despite people who use drugs routinely having needs that encompass both services. The co-occurring SUT and harm reduction needs of people who use drugs warrant collaboration between service providers. However, little work has explored such collaborations, or lack thereof. This research explores how SUT providers responded to expanded harm reduction programming from the perspectives of syringe services program (SSP) operators in Michigan.
Methods:
We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with a geographically diverse sample of SSP operators (n = 19) in Michigan during October and November 2021. The interview guide broadly explored the contributing factors to SSP implementation, including SSP relationships with SUT providers. Analyses of transcribed interviews were conducted using an iterative, thematic constant comparison process informed by grounded theory.
Results:
Participants described a range of responses to SSP implementation from SUT providers. Many SSP operators identified significant barriers to effective collaboration with SUT providers due to lack of awareness about harm reduction approaches and stigmatization of drug use. For example, SUT providers were often reluctant to accept free harm reduction supplies (e.g., sterile syringes, naloxone) to offer their clients. Participants also reported difficulties connecting their clients to evidence-based SUT providers. Incremental relationship building and education about the role of harm reduction in recovery were required for effective collaboration between SUT providers and SSPs.
Conclusions:
Tensions between SUT and harm reduction providers may create challenges that impede recovery among people who use drugs. Ensuring SUT and harm reduction providers understand the unique and complementary roles of each approach is necessary to advance the health of people who use drugs.
More Related Videos
10:17High-throughput and Comprehensive Drug Surveillance Using Multisegment Injection-Capillary Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry
Published on: April 23, 2019
09:29Investigating Drivers of Antireward in Addiction Behavior with Anatomically Specific Single-Cell Gene Expression Methods
Published on: August 4, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Healthcare Agencies II
Parish nursing is a growing specialty nursing profession that focuses on holistic healthcare, health promotion, and illness prevention. It blends professional nursing practice with a health ministry, focusing on health and healing within the context of a Christian community. Parish nurses serve as health educators, referral sources, and lay...
Drug Abuse and Addiction: Pharmacological Phenomena
Substance Use Disorders Affecting Sleep
Understanding the concepts of physical dependence,...
Drug Therapy
Antianxiety Medications
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...