Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Manufacturing Abdominal Aorta Hydrogel Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms for Ultrasound Elastography Validation
Published on: September 19, 2018
Questions and Certainty in Diagnosis and Management of Acute Type B Aortic Dissection
Luigi Lovato1, Maria Adriana Cocozza1, Alessandro Onori2
1Pediatric and Adult Cardiothoracic and Vascular, Oncohematologic and Emergency Radiology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Insights
Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) management is evolving. While computed tomography angiography (CTA) is key for diagnosis, advanced imaging like MRI and PET are for stable patients. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) offers a minimally invasive option, but its use in uncomplicated TBAD is debated.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Medical Imaging
- Surgical Innovation
Background:
- Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is a critical condition demanding prompt diagnosis and intervention.
- Current management strategies involve complex diagnostic and therapeutic decisions.
- Controversies persist regarding optimal diagnostic modalities and treatment approaches for TBAD.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and analyze the most critical and controversial aspects of contemporary Type B aortic dissection management.
- To evaluate the role of advanced imaging techniques in TBAD diagnosis and monitoring.
- To critically assess the current evidence and clinical practice surrounding thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for TBAD.
Main Methods:
- Comprehensive review of current literature on TBAD diagnosis and treatment.
- Analysis of the utility of computed tomography angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET) in TBAD.
- Evaluation of the evidence for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) versus medical therapy and open surgery for complicated and uncomplicated TBAD.
Main Results:
- Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is the cornerstone for acute TBAD diagnosis and monitoring.
- Advanced imaging (MRI, PET) shows potential but is best reserved for stable patients.
- Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a viable option for complicated TBAD, reducing perioperative risks.
- The role of preemptive TEVAR in uncomplicated TBAD remains controversial, with ongoing debate on long-term outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Accurate diagnosis using CTA is crucial for timely intervention in acute TBAD.
- TEVAR represents a significant advancement for complicated TBAD, offering a less invasive approach.
- Further research is needed to clarify the optimal use of TEVAR in uncomplicated TBAD and its long-term efficacy.
Abstract:
Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is a severe cardiovascular condition that requires timely diagnosis and intervention to prevent life-threatening complications. The aim of this review was to focus on the most crucial and controversial aspects of contemporary TBAD management. It is recognized that in the acute phase, computed tomography angiography (CTA) plays an essential role in evaluating the extent of the dissection and monitoring disease progression. CTA has significantly improved the management of TBAD by providing detailed assessments of aortic anatomy and dynamic flow changes, positioning it as the cornerstone imaging modality for identifying acute high-risk patients who may require early intervention. Recently, new advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) technology have the potential to provide further information beyond imaging alone. However, such sophisticated techniques should be reserved for stable patients after the acute phase. After decades of medical therapy and high risk surgery, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery for complicated TBAD, offering lower perioperative morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, its use in uncomplicated TBAD remains a topic of ongoing debate. While recent studies suggest that preemptive TEVAR combined with optimal medical therapy may reduce late adverse events and improve long-term outcomes, these findings remain controversial. This review critically analyzes the current literature on both diagnosis and TEVAR treatment, evaluating these controversies in the context of clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management

