Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

A Novel Murine Model of Arteriovenous Fistula Failure: The Surgical Procedure in Detail
Published on: February 3, 2016
Routine Clinic Surveillance on Arteriovenous Graft Patency in Hemodialysis Patients with Previous Access
Cheng-Chieh Yen1, Hung-Pin Tu2, Tzu-Chen Lin3,4
1Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.
Insights
Routine surveillance for arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) in hemodialysis patients increases interventions like stenting and angioplasty, raising costs without improving graft patency. Further cost-effectiveness studies are needed for AVG monitoring.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Vascular Surgery
- Health Economics
Background:
- Arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) serve as crucial hemodialysis (HD) access for patients with vascular challenges.
- The efficacy of routine surveillance for maintaining AVG function remains under investigation.
- This study evaluates clinical and economic impacts of routine surveillance in HD patients with prior access issues.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the clinical outcomes of routine surveillance for arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) in hemodialysis patients.
- To determine the economic impact of routine surveillance on AVG maintenance and interventions.
- To compare intervention rates and secondary patency between surveillance and non-surveillance groups.
Main Methods:
- A cohort study comparing hemodialysis patients with and without routine AVG surveillance.
- Data collected from the initiation of a collaborative clinic in 2020.
- Primary outcomes included arteriovenous access reconstruction, graft-anastomosis stenting, and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA); secondary outcomes were AVG patency and intervention costs.
Main Results:
- Routine surveillance led to significantly higher rates of graft-anastomosis stenting (0.66 vs. 0.2 per 100 patient-months) and PTA (30.19 vs. 14.17 per 100 patient-months).
- No significant difference was found in arteriovenous access reconstruction rates (0.46 vs. 0.5 per 100 patient-months) or secondary patency (HR: 0.83).
- Total AVG intervention costs were more than double in the surveillance group (110,672 NTD vs. 51,874 NTD).
Conclusions:
- Routine clinic surveillance for AVGs in hemodialysis patients with prior complications increases specific interventions and associated costs.
- Surveillance did not significantly improve arteriovenous access reconstruction rates or secondary patency.
- Further research is warranted to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of routine AVG monitoring strategies.
Abstract:
Background: Arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) are an alternative for hemodialysis (HD) access in patients with inadequate vasculature or advanced age. The effect of routine surveillance for AVG maintenance remains unclear. This study assesses the clinical and economic outcomes of routine surveillance at a collaborative clinic in patients with previous access complications. Methods: We recruited HD patients from the initiation of the clinic in 2020, and divided them into two groups: those receiving routine surveillance and those without. Primary outcomes included AVG interventions (e.g., arteriovenous access [AVA] reconstruction, graft-anastomosis stenting, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty [PTA]). Other outcomes included AVG secondary patency and costs associated with the interventions. Results: Twenty-two patients with routine surveillance and 65 without were recruited. There was no significant difference in AVA reconstruction rate between the surveillance and non-surveillance groups (0.46 vs. 0.5 per 100 patient-months, p = 0.99), however, rates of graft-anastomosis stenting (0.66 vs. 0.2 per 100 patient-months, p = 0.02) and PTA (30.19 vs. 14.17 per 100 patient-months, p < 0.01) were significantly higher in the surveillance group. No significant difference was observed in secondary patency (hazard ratio: 0.83, p = 0.79). The total costs of AVG interventions were more than double in the surveillance group (110672 New Taiwan Dollar [NTD] vs. 51874 NTD, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Routine clinic surveillance in HD patients with AVGs and previous access complications resulted in significantly higher rates of graft-anastomosis stenting, PTA, and associated costs, without significant differences in AVA reconstruction rates or secondary patency. These results highlight the need for further assessment of the cost-effectiveness of routine AVG monitoring.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management

