Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2025

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
Published on: December 18, 2020
Trigger warning ≠ trigger warning: A comparison of differentially worded trigger warnings on negative versus positive
Hannah Willems1, Julia A Glombiewski1, Richard J McNally2
1Department of Psychology, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau.
Trigger warnings (TWs) can affect people differently based on their formulation. Detailed warnings may increase fear but also a sense of respect and autonomy, highlighting the need for context-specific design.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Media Studies
- Communication
Background:
- Trigger warnings (TWs) aim to alert individuals to potentially distressing content.
- Previous research has yielded mixed results regarding the efficacy of TWs.
- The specific wording and detail level of TWs may influence their impact.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how different formulations of trigger warnings affect psychological and emotional responses.
- To assess both negative outcomes (e.g., threat, fear) and positive outcomes (e.g., respect, autonomy).
- To compare the effects of detailed vs. general content warnings.
Main Methods:
- A cross-national online study with 409 participants (German and English speakers).
- Participants rated various detailed trigger warnings on expected threat, fear, preparedness, and avoidance intentions.
- Felt sense of autonomy and respect associated with TWs were also measured.
Main Results:
- Significant differences in outcomes were observed across different TW formulations.
- Detailed warnings increased expected threat, fear, and avoidance intentions compared to general warnings.
- While participants felt more respected by detailed TWs, emotional preparedness did not increase as intended; however, autonomy was enhanced.
Conclusions:
- The formulation of trigger warnings significantly impacts both negative and positive outcomes.
- TW design should be tailored to specific contexts and objectives, such as enhancing autonomy or reducing threat.
- Potential effects like avoidance must be carefully considered for different populations, including those with PTSD.
More Related Videos
11:18Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
Published on: September 12, 2014
08:05A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
Published on: January 5, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Framing Effects
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Positive, Negative, and Zero Work
Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness
Avoidance learning occurs when an organism learns that a specific behavior can prevent an unpleasant outcome. For example, a student who receives a bad grade may start studying harder to avoid future poor grades. This behavior persists even when the negative outcome is no longer present. Avoidance learning is powerful because it maintains behavior in the absence of the...
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Reinforcement
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example: