Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2025

Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way
Published on: May 10, 2021
How Might the Use of Shared Decision-Making With a Patient Mitigate Surgeon Regret in Circumstances of a Poor Outcome
1Colorectal surgeon and palliative medicine physician practicing in Cleveland, Ohio.
Abstract:
Surgeons might experience regret after interventions for high-risk patients who have poor outcomes, even when no errors occurred. Some regret experiences stem from incomplete communications or miscommunications about options, expectations, or prognoses. Experiences of regret, and even moral distress, might be mitigated when surgeons share key surgical care decisions with patients or their surrogates and draw on strategies for communicating well about patients' serious illnesses or injuries. Shared decision-making is a communication framework whose principles may contribute to mitigation of surgeon regret.
Related Concept Videos
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethical Dilemmas II
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Patient-centered Care

