Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...

Decision Making: Traditional Method

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...

Decision Making

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...

Modeling in Therapy

Modeling in Therapy

Modeling, a key technique in therapy, uses observational learning to help clients acquire and practice new skills by watching therapists demonstrate desired behaviors. This approach, rooted in Albert Bandura's concept of vicarious learning, plays a significant role in therapeutic interventions for various psychological conditions, including social anxiety, ADHD, and depression.
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...

Qualitative Analysis

Qualitative Analysis

For solutions containing mixtures of different cations, the identity of each cation can be determined by qualitative analysis. This technique involves a series of selective precipitations with different chemical reagents, each reaction producing a characteristic precipitate for a specific group of cations. Metal ions within a group are further separated by varying the pH, heating the mixture to redissolve a precipitate, or adding other reagents to form complex ions.
For instance, group IV...

Uncertainty: Overview

Uncertainty: Overview

In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Lecanemab treatment improves B cell subpopulation immune homeostasis in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026

Same author

Shared and specific associations of amygdala nuclei volumes with PTSD symptom domains and childhood trauma: An ENIGMA-PGC PTSD mega-analysis.

Molecular psychiatry·2026

Same author

Reconciling hippocampal semantic representations of traumatic memory in PTSD.

Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology·2026

Same author

Direct coupling and protective activation of DRP1 by the DNA-PKcs inhibitor KU-57788 synergizes with ferroptosis in anaplastic thyroid cancer cells.

Cell death & disease·2026

Same author

Designing a children's health exposomics study protocol: The CHILDREN_FIRST multi-country prospective cohort using multi-omics and personalized prevention approaches.

PloS one·2026

Same author

Qualitative Study of Resilience Among Parents of Combat Soldiers During Armed Conflict.

Military medicine·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

Modeling decision-making under uncertainty with qualitative outcomes.

Nachshon Korem^1,2,3, Or Duek^1,3,4, Ruonan Jia²

¹Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.

Plos Computational Biology

|March 3, 2025

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study models uncertainty in qualitative decisions, extracting quantitative values for subjective outcomes. This advances understanding of decision-making under uncertainty across diverse domains.

More Related Videos

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

Area of Science:

Cognitive Science
Behavioral Economics
Decision Theory

Background:

Traditional decision-making models often focus on quantitative outcomes, limiting their application to qualitative scenarios.
Modeling uncertainty attitudes in qualitative decision-making presents a significant challenge for existing frameworks.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and validate a computational model for assessing uncertainty attitudes in decisions involving qualitative outcomes.
To compare uncertainty attitudes across quantitative (monetary) and qualitative (medical) decision domains.

Main Methods:

Participants engaged in choice tasks with both quantitative and qualitative outcomes under varying degrees of uncertainty.
Computational modeling techniques were employed to estimate subjective values assigned to qualitative outcomes.
Uncertainty attitudes were quantified and compared between the two decision modalities.

Main Results:

The proposed computational model successfully estimated quantitative values for qualitative outcomes, fitting the observed data well.
The model demonstrated superior performance compared to a standard utility function in quantitative decision tasks.
A significant association was found in ambiguity attitudes across both monetary and medical decision domains, replicated in an independent sample.

Conclusions:

Quantitative measures can be effectively extracted from qualitative outcomes, enhancing the estimation of subjective values.
This approach allows for a more comprehensive characterization of individual behavior and decision-making under uncertainty across various contexts.
The findings have implications for understanding and modeling complex human choices in fields ranging from economics to healthcare.