Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2025

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
Published on: November 9, 2011
A Framework for Counterfactual Explanation of Predictive Uncertainty in Multimodal Models
None:
Both predictive uncertainty estimation and visual explanation are crucial elements in helping humans understand the artificial intelligence (AI) decision-making process and in building trustworthy AI. However, there has been comparatively limited investigation into the intersection of these two domains in multimodal scenarios. In this article, we propose a universal explanation framework to evaluate counterfactual samples of predictive uncertainty in multimodal models. Inspired by multimodal representation learning, our framework leverages a shared latent space of multimodal variational autoencoders (MVAEs) to generate counterfactual explanations (CEs) of predictive uncertainty, enabling us to identify the input features contributing to high predictive uncertainty. To further evaluate the quality of counterfactual samples, we propose a Bayesian local linear approximation (BLLA) method. This method models the overall linear space as an inverse chi-square distribution while representing feature importance and the error term as normal distributions. By doing so, it captures the uncertainty and feature importance of each modality. Through a comprehensive suite of experiments conducted on multimodal classification and regression tasks, we demonstrate that our framework successfully generates accurate CEs of predictive uncertainty, establishes the consistency of feature importance, and comprehensively facilitates users' comprehension of multimodal model behavior.
Related Concept Videos
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
Multicompartment Models: Overview
These models offer a more comprehensive representation of drug behavior in the body than one-compartment models. They accommodate the complexity of drug distribution,...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
Uncertainty: Overview
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

