Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Uptake of core outcome sets in paediatric clinical trials: a protocol
Ruobing Lei1,2,3, Janne Estill4,5, Ivan D Florez6,7,8
1Chevidence Lab of Child & Adolescent Health, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Insights
This study examines the use of paediatric core outcome sets (COS) in clinical trials. It analyzes COS development, patient involvement, and trialist awareness to improve the application of these crucial pediatric research tools.
Area of Science:
- Paediatric research methodology
- Clinical trial design and conduct
- Health outcomes research
Background:
- Numerous paediatric core outcome sets (COS) have been developed, yet their uptake in clinical trials requires further investigation.
- Previous research highlights the importance of COS awareness, development processes (including patient participation), and developer actions in promoting COS adoption.
- Understanding the rationale and practical application of paediatric COS is essential for improving evidence synthesis and clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the rationale and utilization of paediatric core outcome sets (COS) within clinical trials.
- To analyze the awareness and perspectives of both COS developers and clinical trialists regarding COS development and implementation.
- To identify factors influencing the uptake and effective use of paediatric COS in research.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of identified paediatric COS, including target condition, population, intervention, core outcomes, and patient involvement.
- Registry searches (ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP) to identify relevant paediatric clinical trials.
- Comparative analysis of COS-trial outcome scope matching and qualitative data collection via surveys and interviews with COS developers and trialists.
Main Results:
- Identification and characterization of paediatric COS and their corresponding clinical trials.
- Assessment of the degree of outcome matching between COS and clinical trials.
- In-depth examination of the views and experiences of COS developers and clinical trialists.
Conclusions:
- The study will provide critical insights into the current use and perceived barriers to paediatric COS adoption in clinical trials.
- Findings will inform strategies to enhance the development and implementation of COS, ultimately improving the quality and comparability of paediatric research.
- Recommendations will be formulated to optimize the integration of COS into paediatric clinical trial design and reporting.
Introduction:
A growing number of paediatric core outcome sets (COS) have been developed in the past 20 years. Previous studies have provided many useful insights into the uptake of COS. In addition to the awareness of COS among clinical trialists, the COS development process (especially patient participation) and the actions of the developers can promote COS uptake. However, the uptake of COS in paediatric clinical trials needs to be further explored. The aim of this study is to provide information on the rationale and use of paediatric COS in clinical trials, and to analyse in depth the awareness and views of COS developers and clinical trialists about the development and use of COS.
Methods And Analysis:
We will include all paediatric COS identified in our previous systematic review and those subsequently included in the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) database. We will extract the target condition, population, intervention, list of core outcomes and the details of patient involvement. Next, we will search the Clinicaltrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for trials on health conditions addressed by the identified COS. We will assess the comparability of the scopes in each COS-trial pair and determine for the outcomes in each clinical trial if they match exactly or generally, or if they do not match, with the outcomes of their respective COS. Finally, we will conduct a survey and semistructured interviews among COS developers and clinical trialists to examine their views.
Ethics And Dissemination:
Ethical approval for the study has been granted by the ethics committee of the Institute of Health Data Science, Lanzhou University (No. HDS-202405-01). This study was registered on COMET (https://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/3122).
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion