Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Biological Influences on Intelligence

Biological Influences on Intelligence

Intelligence is often thought to be linked to brain size, but the relationship is more complex than that. While brain size does correlate modestly with some abilities, like verbal skills, the connection is weaker for others, such as spatial reasoning. Other factors, like brain structure, also play crucial roles. For instance, despite Einstein's smaller-than-average brain, his parietal cortex, which is involved in spatial reasoning, was 15% wider, suggesting that neural density might matter...

Stereotype Content Model

Stereotype Content Model

The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...

Traits and States

Traits and States

Personality traits represent consistent patterns in behavior, thoughts, and emotions, reflecting an individual's tendencies across various situations. For example, extraversion, a well-known trait, manifests in individuals as talkative, energetic, and enthusiastic behaviors. These traits are stable over time, offering a reliable framework for predicting how people might act in different contexts. However, they do not define every moment of an individual's life. In contrast to traits,...

Cultural Influences on Personality

Cultural Influences on Personality

Individualist and collectivist cultures emphasize different core values, shaping personality in distinct ways. In individualist cultures, such as those in the United States, England, and Australia, people prioritize independence, competition, and personal achievement. These societies tend to promote self-focused traits, with individuals often reporting higher levels of self-esteem. In contrast, collectivist cultures, commonly found in regions like Asia, Africa, and South America, emphasize...

Environmental Influences on Intelligence

Environmental Influences on Intelligence

Despite the strong genetic influence on traits like intelligence, environmental factors significantly shape outcomes. For example, while over 90% of height variation is due to genetic differences, environmental factors such as nutrition also have a notable impact. Similarly, for intelligence, changes in a child's surroundings can significantly alter their IQ. Research shows that enriched environments boost children's academic success and help them develop key cognitive skills. Children...

Social Loafing

Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Automated irrigation systems in mitigating laser-induced temperature during simulated ureteroscopy.

BJU international·2026

Same author

Psychedelic Use, Microdosing, Motives, and Information and Product Sources Among Young Adults in the United States.

Journal of psychoactive drugs·2026

Same author

'No lu'au for baby's 1st birthday': becoming a mother during the COVID-19 pandemic in Hawai'i.

Ethnicity & health·2026

Same author

Multiomics characterization of acute child illness and mortality in Africa and South Asia.

Nature communications·2026

Same author

Experiences of registered nurses and nursing assistants during COVID-19: Work stress, stress appraisal, and workplace resources; A qualitative descriptive study.

PloS one·2026

Same author

Revisions to the <i>Gliophorus irrigatus</i> complex (Agaricales, Hygrophoraceae, <i>Gliophorus</i>, section Unguinosae) including four new species, one new combination and comparisons of basidiome vs. eDNA distributions.

MycoKeys·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2025

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

Artificial social intelligence in teamwork: how team traits influence human-AI dynamics in complex tasks.

Rhyse Bendell¹, Jessica Williams¹, Stephen M Fiore^1,2

¹Cognitive Sciences Laboratory, Institute for Simulation and Training, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States.

Frontiers in Robotics and AI

|March 4, 2025

Summary

Artificial Social Intelligence (ASI) can improve human teamwork in complex tasks. Team potential positively influences perceptions of ASI, but team performance is key to how humans view their collaborators.

Keywords:

artificial social intelligence human-agent teams team cognition team performance team process theory of mind

More Related Videos

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2025

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Area of Science:

Artificial Intelligence
Human-Computer Interaction
Organizational Psychology

Background:

Integrating Artificial Social Intelligence (ASI) into human teams is crucial for enhancing collaborative work.
Understanding how ASI influences team dynamics and performance in complex tasks is an emerging research area.
Artificial Theory of Mind (AToM) is a key capability being developed for ASI advisors.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the integration of ASI advisors into human teams performing interdependent tasks.
To examine how team potential (taskwork and teamwork) influences perceptions of team processes and ASI advisors.
To determine the mediating role of team performance on these perceptions.

Main Methods:

Three-person human teams collaborated with ASI advisors exhibiting Artificial Theory of Mind (AToM).
A profiling model categorized teams based on taskwork and teamwork potential.
Perceptions of team processes and ASI advisors were collected and analyzed.

Main Results:

Teams with higher taskwork or teamwork potential reported more positive perceptions of team processes.
Team performance significantly mediated subjective perceptions of team processes.
Perceptions of ASI advisors were positively correlated with team potential, independent of performance.

Conclusions:

Team potential is a significant factor in how human teams perceive their collaborative environment and ASI.
Objective team performance strongly influences subjective impressions of team processes.
ASI systems must be adaptable to individual team traits to be perceived as effective collaborators.