Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2025
Evaluation of Biomaterials for Bladder Augmentation using Cystometric Analyses in Various Rodent Models
Published on: August 9, 2012
North American study and meta-analysis evaluating performance of Bladder EpiCheck®, a FDA cleared test, in non-muscle
Neil Fleshner1, Herbert Barton Grossman2, Ryan Berglund3
1Division of Urology, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Background:
Bladder EpiCheck (BE) is a novel methylation-based PCR urine test for the detection of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) recurrences.
Objective:
We present the results of a North American study evaluating BE and meta-analysis of literature.
Methods:
A prospective, blinded, multicenter study was conducted in North America. Voided urine was collected from NMIBC patients prior to cystoscopic surveillance. BE testing was performed centrally. For the meta-analysis, a PUBMED search was performed to identify all published peer-reviewed clinical studies of BE for NMIBC surveillance.
Results:
In this study, 674 patients were enrolled of which 449 were included. Overall sensitivity was 67% (95%CI 58%-74%), specificity was 84% (80%-88%), PPV was 65% (57%-73%) and NPV was 85% (81%-89%). For high-grade (HG) recurrence, sensitivity was 77% (65%-85%) and NPV was 95% (92%-97%).In patients with negative cystoscopy and cytology at the first study visit, risk of subsequent recurrence in 12 months was 5.3 (2.7-10.3) times higher in patients with positive BE vs. negative BE (p < 0.0001). In patients with negative cystoscopy and equivocal cytology, BE was positive in 75-89% of those with later HG recurrence, with PPV of 42% (15%-72%)-63% (38%-84%).The meta-analysis included 7 studies and 1564 patients. Overall sensitivity was 82% (66-92%), HG sensitivity was 91% (82-95%), specificity was 85% (80-88%), PPV was 60% (55-64%) and HG NPV was 98% (97-99%).
Conclusions:
The consistently strong performance of BE indicate that a positive test could improve timely disease recurrence detection and a negative test could rule-out HG disease. Furthermore, the low rate of false positive results, potentially minimizes unnecessary downstream procedures and patient anxiety.
