Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs02:26

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

17.0K
Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
17.0K
Genome Copying Errors02:46

Genome Copying Errors

4.1K
DNA replication is a well-evolved process that copies millions of base pairs with high fidelity during each cell division. Occasionally a wrong base or a long stretch of wrong bases may get added to the daughter strands. If the errors are left unchecked, cells might accumulate several mutations that might endanger their  survival. Therefore, the copying errors are checked and repaired at three levels.
4.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparative mitochondrial genome and transcriptome analyses reveal strain-specific features of RNA editing in Trypanosoma brucei.

Nucleic acids research·2025
Same author

Structural basis of gRNA stabilization and mRNA recognition in trypanosomal RNA editing.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2023
Same author

Unearths IFNB1 immune infiltrates in SOP-related ossification of ligamentum flavum pathogenesis.

Heliyon·2023
Same author

High expression of PD-L1 mainly occurs in non-small cell lung cancer patients with squamous cell carcinoma or poor differentiation.

Oncology research·2023
Same author

Overexpression of AXL on macrophages associates with disease severity and recurrence in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

International immunopharmacology·2023
Same author

Development and validation of an oxidative stress‑related prognostic signature in osteosarcoma: A combination of molecular experiments and bioinformatics.

Oncology letters·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2025

Detection of Copy Number Alterations Using Single Cell Sequencing
09:45

Detection of Copy Number Alterations Using Single Cell Sequencing

Published on: February 17, 2017

11.6K

Benchmarking copy number aberrations inference tools using single-cell multi-omics datasets.

Minfang Song1,2,3, Shuai Ma2,3, Gong Wang2,3

  • 1Research Center for Life Sciences Computing, Zhejiang Lab, Kechuang Avenue, Zhongtai Sub-District, Yuhang District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311121, China.

Briefings in Bioinformatics
|March 4, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study benchmarks computational methods for inferring copy number alterations (CNAs) from single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data. Numbat and CopyKAT demonstrated superior performance across various metrics, aiding researchers in selecting optimal tools for cancer genomics.

Keywords:
copy number aberrationscopy number alterationcopy number variationsloss of heterozygositysingle cell multi-omicssingle-cell RNA sequencing

More Related Videos

Droplet Barcoding-Based Single Cell Transcriptomics of Adult Mammalian Tissues
10:12

Droplet Barcoding-Based Single Cell Transcriptomics of Adult Mammalian Tissues

Published on: January 10, 2019

18.4K
Reusable Single Cell for Iterative Epigenomic Analyses
10:28

Reusable Single Cell for Iterative Epigenomic Analyses

Published on: February 11, 2022

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2025

Detection of Copy Number Alterations Using Single Cell Sequencing
09:45

Detection of Copy Number Alterations Using Single Cell Sequencing

Published on: February 17, 2017

11.6K
Droplet Barcoding-Based Single Cell Transcriptomics of Adult Mammalian Tissues
10:12

Droplet Barcoding-Based Single Cell Transcriptomics of Adult Mammalian Tissues

Published on: January 10, 2019

18.4K
Reusable Single Cell for Iterative Epigenomic Analyses
10:28

Reusable Single Cell for Iterative Epigenomic Analyses

Published on: February 11, 2022

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Computational Biology
  • Cancer Research

Background:

  • Copy number alterations (CNAs) are key genomic variations driving cancer initiation and progression.
  • Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) enables CNA inference, but method performance lacks comprehensive benchmarking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comprehensively evaluate and compare the performance of five state-of-the-art computational methods for inferring CNAs from scRNA-seq data.
  • To provide guidelines for selecting appropriate CNA inference tools based on specific research needs and datasets.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluated five leading computational methods for CNA inference from scRNA-seq data.
  • Assessed performance based on tumor vs. normal cell classification, CNA profile accuracy, tumor subclone inference, and aneuploidy identification.
  • Investigated the impact of referencing settings, tumor microenvironment cell inclusion, tumor type, and purity on method performance.

Main Results:

  • Numbat generally outperformed other methods across most evaluation criteria.
  • CopyKAT showed excellent performance when using only the expression matrix.
  • SCEVAN excelled in clonal breakpoint detection, and Numbat demonstrated high sensitivity for copy number neutral loss of heterozygosity (cnLOH) detection.

Conclusions:

  • This benchmark study offers valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of current CNA inference tools for scRNA-seq data.
  • The findings guide researchers in selecting the most suitable method for their specific cancer genomics applications, improving data interpretation and discovery.