Efficacy of Molecular-targeted Agents in Vertebral Metastasis Management in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Midori Yui1, Satoaki Nakamura2, Yuhei Koike1

  • 1Division of Radiation Oncology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.

Anticancer Research
|March 4, 2025
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Molecular-targeted agents (MTAs) show superior outcomes for vertebral metastases in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients without prior therapy. Previously treated patients experienced significantly worse outcomes, highlighting the importance of treatment history.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Medical Science
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Vertebral metastases in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) pose a significant clinical challenge.
  • The efficacy of modern molecular-targeted agents (MTAs) in managing these metastases is not well-established.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the local control effects of MTAs on vertebral metastases in NSCLC patients.
  • To compare outcomes between patients receiving MTAs and those receiving non-MTAs.
  • To assess the impact of prior systemic therapy on vertebral metastasis control.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 307 vertebral metastases in 85 NSCLC patients (2019-2021).
  • Categorization based on prior systemic therapy exposure and first-line therapy type (MTA vs. non-MTA).
  • Multivariate analyses using Cox proportional hazards model with propensity scores for vertebral progression-free period (vPFP) and overall survival (OS).

Main Results:

  • In treatment-naïve patients, MTAs showed superior 1-year vPFP (93.6%) and OS (90.3%) compared to non-MTAs.
  • Patients without prior systemic therapy had significantly better outcomes than previously treated patients (1-year vPFP: 89.5% vs. 49.1%; 1-year OS: 75.2% vs. 34.2%).
  • Prior systemic therapy was a significant predictor of poor outcomes (vPFP HR=6.78, OS HR=2.13).

Conclusions:

  • Modern MTAs are effective in controlling vertebral metastases in NSCLC patients with no prior systemic therapy.
  • Deferring local treatments may be viable for treatment-naïve patients.
  • Patients developing vertebral metastases after prior treatment may necessitate additional interventions.