Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Speciation Rates01:07

Speciation Rates

20.9K
Overview
20.9K
Predator-Prey Interactions02:39

Predator-Prey Interactions

16.0K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
16.0K
The Evidence for Evolution02:55

The Evidence for Evolution

42.2K
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.
42.2K
Conservation of Declining Populations02:07

Conservation of Declining Populations

9.6K
Conservation of declining population focuses on ways of detecting, diagnosing, and halting a population decline. The approach uses methods to prevent populations from going extinct.
9.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

60 Years of Science on Contaminants of Emerging Concern in <i>ES&T</i>: From Serendipitous Discoveries to a More Systematic Understanding.

Environmental science & technology·2026
Same author

From Silent Spring to the Awakening of AI: 60 Years of Ecotoxicology Research in <i>ES&T</i>.

Environmental science & technology·2026
Same author

Advancing the Discovery of Emerging Contaminants: A Leap in Technology and Data.

Environmental science & technology·2026
Same author

Intraspecific behavioural and environmental contexts influence collective risk of microplastic ingestion in a social fish.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Further integrating social context into comparative and environmental physiology.

The Journal of experimental biology·2026
Same author

The myth of the metabolic baseline: sleep-wake cycles undermine a foundational assumption in organismal biology.

Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2025

Ecotoxicological Effects of Microplastics on Bird Embryo Development by Hatching without Eggshell
08:11

Ecotoxicological Effects of Microplastics on Bird Embryo Development by Hatching without Eggshell

Published on: August 14, 2021

4.4K

Can Fish Escape the Evolutionary Trap Induced by Microplastics?

Weiwenhui Liang1,2, Bowen Li3, Amelia Munson4

  • 1State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China.

Environmental Science & Technology
|March 4, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Fish species exhibit varied responses to microplastics (MPs) based on visual and olfactory cues. Social context and fasting influence foraging behavior, impacting ecological risks for aquatic ecosystems.

Keywords:
competitionecological riskforagingmicroplasticsmultimodal cues

More Related Videos

Accumulation and Distribution of Fluorescent Microplastics in the Early Life Stages of Zebrafish
06:46

Accumulation and Distribution of Fluorescent Microplastics in the Early Life Stages of Zebrafish

Published on: July 4, 2021

4.6K
Sampling, Sorting, and Characterizing Microplastics in Aquatic Environments with High Suspended Sediment Loads and Large Floating Debris
05:31

Sampling, Sorting, and Characterizing Microplastics in Aquatic Environments with High Suspended Sediment Loads and Large Floating Debris

Published on: July 28, 2018

15.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2025

Ecotoxicological Effects of Microplastics on Bird Embryo Development by Hatching without Eggshell
08:11

Ecotoxicological Effects of Microplastics on Bird Embryo Development by Hatching without Eggshell

Published on: August 14, 2021

4.4K
Accumulation and Distribution of Fluorescent Microplastics in the Early Life Stages of Zebrafish
06:46

Accumulation and Distribution of Fluorescent Microplastics in the Early Life Stages of Zebrafish

Published on: July 4, 2021

4.6K
Sampling, Sorting, and Characterizing Microplastics in Aquatic Environments with High Suspended Sediment Loads and Large Floating Debris
05:31

Sampling, Sorting, and Characterizing Microplastics in Aquatic Environments with High Suspended Sediment Loads and Large Floating Debris

Published on: July 28, 2018

15.9K

Area of Science:

  • Aquatic Ecology
  • Environmental Toxicology
  • Animal Behavior

Background:

  • Microplastic (MP) ingestion poses ecological risks and acts as an evolutionary trap for aquatic species.
  • Understanding the sensory cues driving MP ingestion is crucial for assessing these risks.
  • Fish species display diverse foraging behaviors influenced by environmental factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the susceptibility of three fish species (bass, carp, goldfish) to different microplastic types.
  • To investigate the role of visual and olfactory cues in microplastic ingestion.
  • To examine how social context and fasting affect microplastic foraging behavior.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental quantification of microplastic ingestion and rejection across three fish species.
  • Analysis of species-specific responses to microplastics based on visual and olfactory cues.
  • Assessment of behavioral alterations under varying group sizes and fasting durations.

Main Results:

  • Bass were attracted to visually similar MPs, while carp preferred olfactorily similar MPs.
  • Goldfish utilized oral processing for MP decisions, supported by oropharyngeal structures.
  • Altered group sizes and fasting affected foraging behavior in suction-feeding goldfish and bass, but not filter-feeding carp.

Conclusions:

  • Fish species exhibit distinct sensory preferences and foraging strategies for microplastics.
  • Social context and fasting can indirectly impact fish through altered microplastic foraging behaviors.
  • Findings contribute to understanding microplastic-induced evolutionary traps and ecological risks in aquatic environments.