Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Shrinkage of Dental Composite in Simulated Cavity Measured with Digital Image Correlation
Published on: July 21, 2014
Fracture Resistance of Fiber-Reinforced vs. Conventional Resin Composite Restorations in Structurally Compromised
Hamideh Sadat Mohammadipour1, Mostafa Farajzadeh2, Hediyeh Toutouni3
1Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Abstract:
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate reinforcing effect of different fiber-reinforced resin composites for restoring structurally compromised molars compared to conventional resin composite. Methods and Materials: Sixty healthy human third molars were randomly divided into six groups (n = 10). In G1 to G4, wide mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities with an occlusal depth of 4 mm and proximal boxes with a width of 2/3 of buccolingual distance were prepared. In G5, after preparation of MOD cavities, 2 mm cusp reduction was made. The samples of G6 were remained intact (control). In G1 and G5, the conventional resin composite (G-ænial Posterior), and in G2, short fiber-reinforced resin composite (SFRC: EverX Posterior) were used. In G3 and G4, the Ribbond fibers were applied on base of cavity in buccolingual and cross-sectional direction, respectively, and followed by conventional resin composite restoration. After 24 h maintaining in distilled water at room temperature, fracture resistance of restored teeth was tested with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/s and fracture patterns were also evaluated by stereomicroscope (favorable: above cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and unfavorable: below CEJ). The data was analyzed using Shapiro-Wilk, one-way ANOVA, and post hoc Tukey's HSD tests. Results: The highest fracture strength was obtained in G2 (4051.4 ± 1293.9 N), which was significantly greater than G3 (2886.6 ± 720.4 N; p = 0.005) and G5 (2949.3 ± 307.5 N; p = 0.010). No statistically significant difference was observed between other study groups. The greatest percentage of favorable fracture was recorded in G6 (70%) and G2 (60%). Conclusion: The reconstruction of severely weakened molar teeth with SFRC or incorporating of polyethylene fibers in cross-sectional direction on base of resin composite restoration improved fracture strength and favorably affected fracture modes in comparison to conventional posterior resin composite with or without cusp coverage.
More Related Videos
05:30Roughness Impact of Piezoelectric Dental Scaler on Two Distinct Flowable Composite Filling Materials
Published on: January 10, 2025
07:42Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the...
Stress-Strain Diagram - Brittle Materials
Fiber Reinforced Concrete