Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2025

Humanized NOG Mice for Intravaginal HIV Exposure and Treatment of HIV Infection
Published on: January 31, 2020
Active-Controlled Trial Design for HIV Prevention Trials With a Counterfactual Placebo
Fei Gao1, Holly Janes1, Susan Buchbinder2
1Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Epidemiology Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Abstract:
In the quest for enhanced HIV prevention methods, the advent of antiretroviral drugs as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has marked a significant stride forward. However, the ethical challenges in conducting placebo-controlled trials for new PrEP agents against a backdrop of highly effective existing PrEP options necessitate innovative approaches. This manuscript delves into the design and implementation of active-controlled trials that incorporate a counterfactual placebo estimate-a theoretical estimate of what HIV incidence would have been without effective prevention. We introduce a novel statistical framework for regulatory approval of new PrEP agents, predicated on the assumption of an available and consistent counterfactual placebo estimate. Our approach aims to assess the absolute efficacy (i.e., against placebo) of the new PrEP agent relative to the absolute efficacy of the active control. We propose a two-step procedure for hypothesis testing and further develop an approach that addresses potential biases inherent in non-randomized comparisons to counterfactual placebos. By exploring different scenarios with moderately and highly effective active controls and counterfactual placebo estimates from various sources, we demonstrate how our design can significantly reduce sample sizes compared to traditional non-inferiority trials and offer a robust framework for evaluating new PrEP agents. This work contributes to the methodological repertoire for HIV prevention trials and underscores the importance of adaptability in the face of ethical and practical challenges.
Insights
New trials for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use a novel statistical method comparing active treatments to a theoretical placebo. This approach enhances ethical evaluations and can reduce participant numbers in prevention studies.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials
- HIV Prevention
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Antiretroviral drugs as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) represent a significant advancement in HIV prevention.
- Ethical considerations complicate placebo-controlled trials for new PrEP agents when effective options exist.
- Innovative trial designs are needed to evaluate new PrEP agents ethically and effectively.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce a novel statistical framework for the regulatory approval of new PrEP agents.
- To design active-controlled trials incorporating a counterfactual placebo estimate for assessing absolute efficacy.
- To provide a robust methodology for evaluating new PrEP agents amidst ethical and practical challenges.
Main Methods:
- Development of a statistical framework for regulatory approval assuming a consistent counterfactual placebo estimate.
- Design of active-controlled trials to assess the absolute efficacy of new PrEP agents relative to active controls.
- Proposal of a two-step hypothesis testing procedure and methods to mitigate biases in non-randomized comparisons.
Main Results:
- Demonstration of significantly reduced sample sizes compared to traditional non-inferiority trials.
- Exploration of various scenarios with different active control effectiveness and counterfactual placebo estimates.
- Validation of the proposed design's robustness in evaluating new PrEP agents.
Conclusions:
- The proposed active-controlled trial design with counterfactual placebo estimates offers a viable and ethical approach for evaluating new PrEP agents.
- This methodology addresses the limitations of traditional placebo-controlled and non-inferiority trials in the context of existing effective PrEP.
- The framework contributes to the advancement of HIV prevention trial methodology, emphasizing adaptability and statistical innovation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Blinding
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
What is an Experiment?
Blind Procedures
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.

