Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2025

Identifying Coronary Artery Calcification on Non-gated Computed Tomography Scans
Published on: August 28, 2018
Coronary Artery Calcium Testing-Too Early, Too Late, Too Often
Alexander R Zheutlin1, Anuj K Chokshi2, John T Wilkins1,3
1Division of Cardiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Insights
Coronary artery calcium (CAC) testing aids atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk assessment. This article outlines three scenarios—too early, too late, or too frequent testing—where CAC scores may not be clinically useful for guiding prevention strategies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Preventive Medicine
- Radiology
Background:
- Traditional risk factors and scores guide atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) primary prevention.
- Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring via computed tomography (CT) is recommended for intermediate-risk individuals with uncertainty about statin therapy.
- CAC testing can enhance risk assessment and adherence to cardiovascular risk-reducing behaviors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify clinical scenarios where CAC testing may be omitted or deferred.
- To facilitate clinician-patient discussions regarding the appropriate timing and utility of CAC testing.
- To optimize the clinical utility of CAC scoring as a prognostic tool.
Main Methods:
- Review of clinical guidelines and evidence regarding CAC testing.
- Analysis of three specific scenarios: CAC testing being too early, too late, or repeated too often.
- Consideration of patient-specific factors like age and existing lipid-lowering therapy.
Main Results:
- CAC testing is not always beneficial; its utility depends on clinical context.
- Testing may be too early for high-risk young adults or too late for older adults already on therapy.
- Overly frequent CAC testing may not yield clinically relevant information.
Conclusions:
- Understanding the optimal timing for CAC testing is crucial for maximizing its clinical value.
- CAC testing should be integrated judiciously into the decision-making process for lipid-lowering therapy.
- Optimizing CAC testing enhances its role as a prognostic tool in ASCVD prevention.
Importance:
Traditional risk factors, enhancing factors, and risk scores help clinicians assess atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk for primary prevention. The latest cholesterol guidelines suggest measuring coronary artery calcium (CAC) score by computed tomography (CT) in those at intermediate risk when there is uncertainty about statin initiation for primary prevention. CAC testing can improve both risk estimation and adherence to cardiovascular risk-reducing behaviors.
Observations:
As measuring CAC score has become more widely available, this article focuses on 3 situations where CAC testing may be omitted or deferred until a time when CAC testing can provide clinically useful information. Three clinical scenarios to facilitate the clinician-patient risk discussion are as follows: (1) when CAC testing is too early, (2) when CAC testing is too late, and (3) when CAC testing is repeated too often. The timing of CAC testing sits within the decision point of lipid-lowering therapy use. High-risk young adults may face an elevated lifetime risk of cardiovascular disease despite a CAC level of 0, whereas older adults may not see an expected benefit over a short time horizon or may already be taking lipid-lowering therapy, rendering a CAC score less valuable. Integrating a CAC score into the decision to initiate lipid-lowering therapy requires understanding of a patient's risk factors, including age, as well as the natural history of atherosclerosis and related events.
Conclusions And Relevance:
These clinical scenarios reflect when consideration of CAC score is of use and when it is not. Although CAC testing is becoming more widely available and sought after by clinicians and patients alike, it is only as useful as the clinical context. Understanding when assessing CAC score is too early to effectively rule out risk, too late to influence decisions, or too often to yield clinically relevant information provides important insights that optimize the clinical utility of this potentially valuable prognostic tool.
More Related Videos
06:57Author Spotlight: Advancing Cardiovascular Imaging - Introducing the Spatially Weighted Calcium Score for Early Disease Detection
Published on: September 22, 2023
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System I:Echocardiography
Indications: Echocardiography is utilized to diagnose heart failure, valve disorders, and myocardial infarction. It also assesses cardiac structures' size, shape, and motion,...
Electrocardiogram
Three major waveforms are present in a typical ECG recording: the P wave, the QRS complex, and...