Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

73.1K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
73.1K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

37.7K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
37.7K
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

583
Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
583
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

8.6K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate...
8.6K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

5.6K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
5.6K
Estimation of the Physical Quantities01:05

Estimation of the Physical Quantities

4.1K
On many occasions, physicists, other scientists, and engineers need to make estimates of a particular quantity. These are sometimes referred to as guesstimates, order-of-magnitude approximations, back-of-the-envelope calculations, or Fermi calculations. The physicist Enrico Fermi was famous for his ability to estimate various kinds of data with surprising precision. Estimating does not mean guessing a number or a formula at random. Instead, estimation means using prior experience and sound...
4.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The role of perceived competence in remote cochlear implant aftercare: a mixed-methods study.

Frontiers in digital health·2026
Same author

Peritruncal hematoma volume: is it a neglected prognostic marker in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?

Journal of neurosurgery·2026
Same author

Challenges in cochlear implant care for patients with migration backgrounds: Evaluating (Hr)QoL.

Journal of migration and health·2026
Same author

Deep immunophenotyping in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective and controlled clinical study.

Journal of neuroinflammation·2025
Same author

Be Cognative: Cognates in the Rehabilitation of Cochlear Implant Users with German as a Second Language - A Computer-Based Experiment.

International journal of language & communication disorders·2025
Same author

Comparative evaluation of the CGuard dual-layer stent and Carotid Wallstent for elective carotid artery stenting: a retrospective multicenter study.

Neuroradiology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2025

Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients
02:28

Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients

Published on: March 1, 2024

323

The Accuracy of Physicians' Quantitative Estimates.

Lisa Margarete Knipps1, Igor Fischer, Thomas Klenzner

  • 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical Faculty of Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf and University Hospital Düsseldorf; Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty of Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf and University Hospital Düsseldorf.

Deutsches Arzteblatt International
|March 5, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Physicians frequently underestimate object sizes by 15%, even when using common comparisons. Accurate size estimation in clinical practice requires using measurement tools rather than relying on visual estimates.

More Related Videos

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
07:57

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

13.3K
Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

15.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2025

Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients
02:28

Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients

Published on: March 1, 2024

323
Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
07:57

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

13.3K
Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

15.6K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Practice
  • Clinical Measurement
  • Physician Education

Background:

  • Physicians often use everyday objects for size comparisons in medical descriptions.
  • The accuracy of these visual size estimations is not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate physicians' accuracy in estimating object sizes.
  • To determine if comparisons with everyday objects improve estimation accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • An internet-based questionnaire was used to assess physicians' size estimations of everyday objects and SI units.
  • Physicians also estimated their own accuracy.

Main Results:

  • Physicians underestimated sizes by an average of 15%.
  • Self-assessed accuracy did not correlate with actual accuracy; specialists were not more accurate than residents.
  • Clinical experience and use of measurement aids did not improve estimation accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • Underestimations can lead to inaccurate clinical descriptions and decision-making.
  • Physicians should use appropriate measurement instruments instead of visual estimates.
  • This recommendation applies regardless of specialty or experience level.