Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Trial and Error and Algorithm01:12

Trial and Error and Algorithm

A problem-solving strategy is a plan of action used to find a solution. Different strategies have distinct action plans. Trial and error involves trying different solutions until one works. For instance, to fix a broken printer, you might check ink levels, ensure the paper tray isn't jammed, and verify the printer's connection to your laptop. This method can be time-consuming but is commonly used. Thomas Edison, for example, used trial and error to find a suitable filament for the light bulb,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Error detection and correction in intracortical brain-machine interfaces controlling two finger groups.

Journal of neural engineering·2023
Same author

Determining the internal orientation, degree of ordering, and volume of elongated nanocavities by NMR: Application to studies of plant stem.

Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997)·2022
Same author

Error related EEG potentials evoked by visuo-motor rotations.

Brain research·2021
Same author

Shifts in Estimated Preferred Directions During Simulated BMI Experiments With No Adaptation.

Frontiers in systems neuroscience·2021
Same author

Effects of model inaccuracies on reaching movements with intermittent control.

PloS one·2019
Same author

Vib-bracelet: a passive absorber for attenuating forearm tremor.

Medical & biological engineering & computing·2017
Same journal

Cortex-anchored sensor-space harmonics for event-related EEG.

Journal of neural engineering·2026
Same journal

Neural mechanisms of mixed speech and grasp representation in sensorimotor cortices.

Journal of neural engineering·2026
Same journal

Developing a binary communication protocol between biological neural networks using virtual white matter.

Journal of neural engineering·2026
Same journal

Spatiotemporally distinctive astrocytic and neuronal responses to repetitive intracortical microstimulation.

Journal of neural engineering·2026
Same journal

A neural mass modelling framework for evaluating EEG source localisation of seizure activity.

Journal of neural engineering·2026
Same journal

Functional and effective connectivity methods from SEEG for characterizing epileptogenic networks in refractory epilepsy: a comprehensive review and future directions.

Journal of neural engineering·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

9.0K

Self-correcting brain computer interface based on classification of multiple error-related potentials.

Igor Demchenko1, Tamar Shavit1,2, Miri Benyamini1

  • 1Brain Computer Interfaces for Rehabilitation Laboratory, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.

Journal of Neural Engineering
|March 5, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study developed a self-correcting brain-computer interface (BCI) that classifies errors to improve accuracy. Correcting actions based on error classification significantly enhanced BCI performance for controlling virtual hands.

Keywords:
EEGbrain–computer interfaceserror correctionerror-related potentialsvirtual hands

More Related Videos

P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation
06:09

P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation

Published on: September 8, 2023

474
A Single-Channel and Non-Invasive Wearable Brain-Computer Interface for Industry and Healthcare
06:34

A Single-Channel and Non-Invasive Wearable Brain-Computer Interface for Industry and Healthcare

Published on: July 7, 2023

2.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

9.0K
P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation
06:09

P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation

Published on: September 8, 2023

474
A Single-Channel and Non-Invasive Wearable Brain-Computer Interface for Industry and Healthcare
06:34

A Single-Channel and Non-Invasive Wearable Brain-Computer Interface for Industry and Healthcare

Published on: July 7, 2023

2.2K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Electroencephalogram (EEG)-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) offer non-invasive control over devices.
  • BCI accuracy is limited by command interpretation errors.
  • Detecting error-related potentials (ErrPs) can improve BCI performance by identifying erroneous actions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an error classifier (EC) for BCIs.
  • To investigate if classifying and correcting errors improves BCI performance compared to simply undoing actions.
  • To enhance the reliability and user-friendliness of non-invasive BCIs.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a BCI application to control virtual hand poses with three commands.
  • Implemented a self-correcting mechanism incorporating an EC.
  • Evaluated the BCI in three phases: hand control, initial brain control, and self-correcting brain control with 22 participants (11 completing all phases).

Main Results:

  • The self-correcting BCI, utilizing error classification and correction, improved the success rate for all 11 participants.
  • An average success rate improvement of 6.6% was observed.
  • The maximum improvement in success rate reached 13.5%.

Conclusions:

  • Error classification and subsequent action correction significantly enhance BCI accuracy.
  • This self-correction strategy represents a substantial advancement for developing more dependable non-invasive BCIs.
  • The findings pave the way for more intuitive and effective brain-computer interfaces.