Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2025

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
Published on: April 12, 2021
Examining Trends in Medicare Advantage Plan Disenrollment Associated With Expanded Supplemental Benefit Adoption
Emma L Tucher1,2, David J Meyers2,3, Amal N Trivedi2,3,4
1Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research, Pleasanton, California, USA.
Objective:
To evaluate the association between Medicare Advantage (MA) supplemental benefit adoption and plan disenrollment among plans that adopted either the 2019 nonmedical primarily health-related benefits (PHRB) or the 2020 social needs Special Supplemental Benefits for the Chronically Ill (SSBCIs).
Study Setting And Design:
We linked individual-level Medicare administrative data to publicly available, plan-level MA benefit, enrollment, crosswalk, and penetration files from 2017 to 2021. The PHRB benefits included benefits such as caregiver support, adult day care, in-home support services, and so forth. The SSBCI benefits included benefits such as food and produce, nonmedical transportation, pest control, and so forth. We used a difference-in-differences design studying MA enrollees stratified by Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility status.
Data Sources And Analytic Sample:
We included individuals from across the 50 United States and DC enrolled in MA plans that adopted a PHRB in 2019 or SSBCI in 2020 and matched comparator plans from the same counties that did not adopt either benefit. Individuals were excluded if they moved, died, or lacked county-level information during the year.
Principal Findings:
Our sample includes 8,947,810 unique MA enrollees (27.4% in plans that adopted a PHRB and 1.0% in plans that adopted an SSBCI). For dual-eligible enrollees, neither PHRB adoption (0.2%, 95% CI, -2.7%, 2.8%) nor SSBCI adoption (-1.7%, 95% CI, -6.0%, 2.5%) was significantly associated with the rate of plan disenrollment. For Medicare-only enrollees, neither PHRB adoption (-2.6%, 95% CI, -5.9%, 0.7%) nor SSBCI adoption (-5.4%, 95% CI, -15.8%, 5.1%) was significantly associated with the disenrollment rate.
Conclusion:
The promise of these benefits was that MA plans could more directly address enrollees' nonmedical and social needs, leading to better social and health outcomes and reducing costs. We find that adoption did not decrease plan disenrollment, which suggests it may not drive enrollment decisions.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
08:27Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Current Trends in Nursing II
Standards of Care I
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Standards of Care II
Current Trends in Nursing I