Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Surveys02:16

Surveys

14.7K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.7K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

12.6K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.6K
Data Collection by Survey01:07

Data Collection by Survey

6.4K
The systematic method of obtaining and analyzing accurate information of a population is called data collection. A survey is a standard method of data collection that involves collecting information from a target human population about their experience, opinion, or knowledge of a product, service, or process. The responses are recorded and interpreted. The most common survey examples are written questionnaires, face-to-face or telephonic conversations, focus groups, and electronic (e-mail or...
6.4K
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data01:23

Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data

257
A thorough health history and physical assessment are essential for identifying cardiovascular disease (CVD) symptoms and distinguishing them from other health issues.
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
257
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

3.2K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
3.2K
Data Collection I01:30

Data Collection I

6.0K
Data collection gathers information needed to make accurate judgments about a patient's present condition. During a health history interview, subjective data is collected from the patient, their caregivers, or family members, and objective data is collected through observations and physical assessment. Patients are the primary source of subjective data. Thus information gathered from patients through interviews, observations, and physical examination is primary data. Secondary sources of...
6.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How Contaminated Is the Surgical Field in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty? A Preliminary Quantitative Intraoperative Microbiological Study.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

Implementation of a nurse-led visit and follow-up for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms: a quality improvement project.

BMJ open quality·2026
Same author

Global inequities in the adoption of innovative clinical trial designs: a cross-sectional analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Endodontic Treatment of Apical Periodontitis Mitigates Systemic Inflammation and Restores the Blood-Brain Barrier Integrity in an In Vitro Model.

International endodontic journal·2026
Same author

Resection of the mesentery vs Kono-S anastomosis in preventing surgical recurrence for primary Crohn disease: the REMEASURE prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Updates in surgery·2026
Same author

Early Identification of DLD in Paediatric Practice: A Pilot Validation of the CLAP Screening Tool in Italian Outpatient Settings.

International journal of language & communication disorders·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2025

Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients
02:28

Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients

Published on: March 1, 2024

322

Validating Patient Perspectives: A Study on the Reliability of Satisfaction Survey Tools.

Lorena Charrier1, Andrea Ricotti2, Fabiana Marnetto2

  • 1Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.

Patient Preference and Adherence
|March 6, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study validated two patient satisfaction questionnaires for Italian hospitals. The reliable and valid tools offer insights for improving healthcare quality and resource allocation.

Keywords:
inpatientoutpatientpatient satisfactionquestionnairevalidation

More Related Videos

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

8.2K
Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults
08:47

Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults

Published on: February 2, 2020

12.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2025

Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients
02:28

Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients

Published on: March 1, 2024

322
E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

8.2K
Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults
08:47

Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults

Published on: February 2, 2020

12.6K

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Quality Assessment
  • Patient Experience Measurement
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Patient perceptions are crucial for enhancing healthcare quality.
  • Validated instruments are needed for accurate patient satisfaction assessment in Italian hospitals.
  • Existing tools lack validation, hindering meaningful evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the internal reliability and construct validity of two patient satisfaction questionnaires.
  • The questionnaires were developed for outpatient and inpatient care settings.
  • The study focused on tools used at Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Torino, Italy.

Main Methods:

  • Questionnaires underwent face and content validation by experts.
  • Patients completed inpatient and outpatient care questionnaires after Ethics Committee approval.
  • Internal reliability (Cronbach's ɑ) and construct validity (confirmatory factor analysis) were analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Both questionnaires demonstrated high internal reliability (Cronbach's ɑ ≥0.80).
  • Significant positive correlations confirmed construct validity with overall satisfaction.
  • Confirmatory factor analysis fit indices met recommended thresholds (CFI>0.9, RMSEA/SRMR<0.08).

Conclusions:

  • The developed questionnaires are valid and reliable for patient satisfaction assessment.
  • These tools provide actionable insights for healthcare improvement and resource allocation.
  • Widespread regional adoption can yield robust, comparable data for decision-making.