Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2025

Measuring the Motor Aspect of Cancer-Related Fatigue using a Handheld Dynamometer
Published on: February 20, 2020
Reliability and validity of the Persian version of the Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions (P-FSMC) in
Marzeih Heidari1, Ghorban Taghizadeh1,2, Seyed Massood Nabavi3
1Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Rehabilitation Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Purpose:
This study evaluated the psychometric feature of the Persian version of the Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions (P-FSMC) in Iranian People with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS).
Materials And Methods:
In this cross-sectional study, 303 PwMS and 102 healthy controls participated. Structural validity was explored using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Construct validity was determined through correlations of P-FSMC with the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS), besides expected differences in P-FSMC scores and by examining score variations based on disability and depression levels. Fatigue discrimination and diagnostic accuracy between PwMS and healthy controls were evaluated.
Results:
The P-FSMC demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability and high internal consistency. EFA revealed two factors explaining 70.08% of the variance, with good fit model. The P-FSMC showed moderate to high correlations with FSS and FIS and distinguished different levels of disability and depression. The total score discriminated fatigue with 86.7% accuracy, 84.5% sensitivity, and 93.1% specificity. Cut-off scores for mild, moderate, and severe fatigue severity were ≥46, ≥56, and ≥66, respectively, with high sensitivity (81.52-91.42%) and specificity (80.02-99.01%).
Conclusions:
The P-FSMC is a reliable and valid questionnaire for assessing fatigue in Iranian PwMS.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Fatigue

