Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

10:19
Evaluation of Biomaterials for Bladder Augmentation using Cystometric Analyses in Various Rodent Models
Published on: August 9, 2012
19.2K
Third Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Placement Following Two Failures in Males: A Real-World Multicenter Study
Francois Meyer1,2, Juliette Cotte3, Lucas Bento4
1Hôpital Saint Louis - AP-HP, Paris, France.
Neurourology and Urodynamics
|March 7, 2025
Summary
Reimplanting a third artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) offers similar early function to a first implant but has lower survival and late outcomes. Patient factors, not surgical technique, predict success, suggesting it may suit motivated individuals with few options.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Medical Devices
- Surgical Outcomes
Background:
- Artificial urinary sphincters (AUS) have a 25% reoperation rate.
- Outcomes after second AUS are scarce; data on third AUS implants are non-existent.
- Reimplantation after erosion or infection leads to poorer survival rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate functional and survival outcomes of a third artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) following two previous explantations.
- To identify predictive factors for reoperation and functional success.
- To assess the long-term viability of multiple AUS reimplantations.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 75 patients receiving a third AUS between 2006-2023 across seven French university hospitals.
- Inclusion criteria: third AUS implant after two previous cuff explantations or revisions.
- Primary endpoint: reoperation-free survival; secondary endpoints: functional outcomes at 6 months and last follow-up.
Main Results:
- 5-year reoperation-free survival was 34.8%. Smoking was the only significant predictor of explantation.
- Early complications occurred in 16.7% of patients.
- At last overall follow-up, 54.8% achieved social continence, but 35.6% failed, with 30.7% needing a fourth or fifth AUS.
Conclusions:
- Third AUS implantation shows comparable early function to primary implants but inferior survival and late functional outcomes.
- Patient-related factors, not surgical technique, predict outcomes.
- A third AUS may be considered for highly motivated patients with limited alternatives, necessitating refined patient selection criteria.

