Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2025

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease
Published on: May 27, 2022
Evaluating the impact of clinical and translational pilot funding using multiple outcome metrics
Ingrid Philibert1,2, Angela Batson1,3, Amanda Fletcher1,4
1Great Plains IDeA-CTR, University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha, Omaha, NE, USA.
Abstract:
NIH/NIGMS-funded IDeA-Clinical and Translational Research (CTR) networks seek to expand translational research infrastructure to support research that has at its endpoints measurable clinical, public health, technological, or economic benefits. This retrospective case study followed 14 projects that received Pilot funding from the Great Plains IDeA-CTR (GP IDeA-CTR) at the University of Nebraska Medical Center. It focuses on the impact of pilot funding and GP IDeA-CTR resources on subsequent clinical and translational research. Metrics include extramural awards, lessons learned that relate to clinical and translational research infrastructure, and demonstrated and potential benefits using the Translational Science Benefits Model (TSBM).
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Longitudinal Research

