Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
25 Years of Electronic Health Record Implementation Processes: Scoping Review
Harriet Finnegan1, Nicola Mountford1
1School of Business, Maynooth University, Kildare, Ireland.
Background:
Electronic health record (EHR) systems have undergone substantial evolution over the past 25 years, transitioning from rudimentary digital repositories to sophisticated tools that are integral to modern health care delivery. These systems have the potential to increase efficiency and improve patient care. However, for these systems to reach their potential, we need to understand how the process of EHR implementation works.
Objective:
This scoping review aimed to examine the implementation process of EHRs from 1999 to 2024 and to articulate process-focused recommendations for future EHR implementations that build on this history of EHR research.
Methods:
We conducted a scoping literature review following a systematic methodological framework. A total of 5 databases were selected from the disciplines of medicine and business: EBSCO, PubMed, Embase, IEEE Explore, and Scopus. The search included studies published from 1999 to 2024 that addressed the process of implementing an EHR. Keywords included "EHR," "EHRS," "Electronic Health Record*," "EMR," "EMRS," "Electronic Medical Record*," "implemen*," and "process." The findings were reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist. The selected literature was thematically coded using NVivo qualitative analysis software, with the results reported qualitatively.
Results:
This review included 90 studies that described the process of EHR implementation in different settings. The studies identified key elements, such as the role of the government and vendors, the importance of communication and relationships, the provision of training and support, and the implementation approach and cost. Four process-related categories emerged from these results: compliance processes, collaboration processes, competence-development processes, and process costs.
Conclusions:
Although EHRs hold immense promise in improving patient care, enhancing research capabilities, and optimizing health care efficiency, there is a pressing need to examine the actual implementation process to understand how to approach implementation. Our findings offer 7 process-focused recommendations for EHR implementation formed from analysis of the selected literature.
More Related Videos
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VII: EMR
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Purpose of Health Records I
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...