Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A comparison of two hearing-aid selection methods.

D N Brooks, M V Chetty

    British Journal of Audiology
    |February 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    What is a good re-entry programme? What are the key-question?--J. Douglas Miller Memorial Lecture.

    Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement·2002
    Same author

    The effects on significant others of providing a hearing aid to the hearing-impaired partner.

    British journal of audiology·2001
    Same author

    Attitudes to hearing difficulty and hearing aids and the outcome of audiological rehabilitation.

    British journal of audiology·1999
    Same author

    Development of the Hearing Attitudes in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (HARQ).

    British journal of audiology·1996
    Same author

    The time course of adaptation to hearing aid use.

    British journal of audiology·1996
    Same author

    Effects of case management after severe head injury.

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1994
    Same journal

    Effects of slow- and fast-acting compression on the detection of gaps in narrow bands of noise.

    British journal of audiology·2002
    Same journal

    Measurement of first- and second-order modulation detection thresholds in listeners with cochlear hearing loss.

    British journal of audiology·2002
    Same journal

    Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. I. Experienced users, fitted bilaterally.

    British journal of audiology·2002
    Same journal

    Assessing service quality in paediatric audiology and early deaf education.

    British journal of audiology·2002
    Same journal

    Comparison of the electroacoustic characteristics of five hearing aids.

    British journal of audiology·2002
    Same journal

    Use of the 'real-ear to dial difference' to derive real-ear SPL from hearing level obtained with insert earphones.

    British journal of audiology·2002
    See all related articles

    A new theoretical method for selecting hearing aids for first-time NHS users showed good agreement with user preferences after six months. This approach accurately predicts desired hearing aid frequency response, improving listening comfort and satisfaction.

    Area of Science:

    • Audiology
    • Hearing Science
    • Biomedical Engineering

    Background:

    • Hearing aid fitting is crucial for effective audiological rehabilitation.
    • Traditional hearing aid selection methods may not always align with user perception of optimal sound quality.
    • Objective measures and subjective user feedback are both vital for successful hearing aid outcomes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate a theoretically derived hearing aid frequency response for new National Health Service (NHS) hearing aid candidates.
    • To assess the long-term listening comfort and user satisfaction with hearing aids fitted using this theoretical method.
    • To determine the agreement between the theoretical prescription and the user's subjective judgment of the best response.

    Main Methods:

    • A theoretical basis was used to determine the target hearing aid frequency response for 30 new NHS hearing aid candidates.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Hearing aids and earmoulds were selected and modified to achieve the target response within +/- 5 dB.
  • Listening comfort was assessed after six months using a TR60 noise pulse audiometer.

    • Main Results:

    • The theoretically derived frequency response closely matched the users' perceived 'best response' in a simulated real-life listening situation.
    • Good agreement was found between the theoretical prescription and user judgment, indicating the method's validity.
    • The selected hearing aids and modifications successfully achieved the target frequency/gain characteristics.

    Conclusions:

    • The theoretical method for hearing aid selection is effective and provides a reliable basis for fitting first-time users.
    • This approach leads to good agreement with user preferences, suggesting improved hearing aid outcomes.
    • The findings encourage the adoption of this theoretical method for optimizing hearing aid selection and enhancing user satisfaction.