Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026
A New Murine Model of Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair
Published on: July 7, 2013
A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing single-stage versus multistaged approaches for endovascular repair of
Miguel Godeiro Fernandez1, Dilson Pimentel-Junior2, Marina Dias-Neto3
1Department of Medicine, Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública, Salvador, Brazil.
Objective:
We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the outcomes of single-stage vs multistaged fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) for extensive thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs).
Methods:
MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to March 2024. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024567099) and followed the PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion was restricted to original studies comparing single-stage vs multistaged FB-EVAR for reported patients evaluated as extensive TAAAs (Crawford/Safi extent I-III and V). A multistaged approach consisted of aneurysm exclusion besides FB-EVAR using one or more staging strategies, including temporary aneurysm sac perfusion, first stage thoracic endovascular aortic repair, unintentional open surgical or endovascular proximal thoracic aortic repair, and minimally invasive staged segmental artery coil embolization. Endpoints evaluated included permanent and any spinal cord injury (SCI), 30-day or in-hospital mortality, acute kidney injury, cardiac, cerebrovascular, and bowel complications. A random effects meta-analysis was performed using pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results:
Four cohort studies involving 1949 patients treated by elective FB-EVAR were included, including 1097 patients (56.28%) treated by the multistaged approach. The most frequently used staging strategy was thoracic endovascular aortic repair in 404 patients (37%). Multistaged repairs significantly reduced permanent SCI events (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.23-0.58; P < .0001), any SCI events (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.29-0.93; P = .03), and 30-day or in-hospital mortality (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.38-0.85; P = .006). Additionally, the multistaged approach was associated with lower risk of acute kidney injury (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.51-0.89; P = .005), although there were no significant differences observed for cardiac, cerebrovascular, or bowel complications.
Conclusions:
Multistaged FB-EVAR for elective extensive TAAA repair significantly reduces the risks of permanent and any SCI events, 30-day or in-hospital mortality, and acute kidney injury.
