Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2025

Pre-clinical Evaluation of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Treatment of Acute Leukemia
Published on: September 18, 2013
Real-World Experience with Venetoclax Treatment for Newly-Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Japan (VENUS Study): An
Tatsunori Goto1, Hiroki Numata2, Yuna Katsuoka3
1Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daiichi Hospital, 3-35 Michishita-cho, Nakamura-ku, Nagoya, 453-8511, Japan. gotot@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp.
Introduction:
Venetoclax has demonstrated clinical benefit for newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but significant neutropenia is a concern. Data on the time course of neutrophil counts for across treatment cycles in real-world settings remain limited. We report an interim analysis of the VENUS study, which examined neutropenia management in patients with AML receiving venetoclax with azacitidine (VEN/AZA) in Japan.
Methods:
This multicenter (10 sites), retrospective, observational study included adults with newly-diagnosed AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy and initiating venetoclax treatment. Treatment patterns, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) use, antifungal prophylaxis, and time course of neutrophil counts were analyzed for patients who received > 1 cycle of venetoclax.
Results:
Venetoclax was administered for a median 27.0 days in Cycle 1 and then a median 21.0 (range 14.0-22.0) days for subsequent cycles, with median dose holds at the end of each cycle of 8.5-15.0 days. Patients (n = 81) receiving G-CSF were treated with VEN/AZA for a median of 6.0 cycles versus 3.0 in those who did not receive G-CSF (n = 39). In Cycle 1, median neutrophil counts decreased to < 500/µl during Days 8-28 but recovered to > 500/µl by Days 29-35. Median nadir neutrophil count was reached during Days 22-28 in almost all subsequent cycles until Cycle 10. Neutrophil counts decreased to < 500/µl in some cycles but improved to > 500/µl by the next week, suggesting neutrophil levels without higher risk of infection in most patients after Cycle 2 with venetoclax dosing schedule modifications and G-CSF administration. Eighty-eight (73.3%) patients received antifungal prophylaxis, but risk-based antifungal prophylaxis may be considered.
Conclusion:
This real-world analysis provides insight into the timing of neutrophil count recovery with dosing schedule modification of venetoclax and G-CSF use in patients with newly-diagnosed AML receiving VEN/AZA, informing timing of the use of antifungal prophylaxis for patients at higher risk.
More Related Videos
05:52Neutrophil Lifespan Extension with CLON-G and an In Vitro Spontaneous Death Assay
Published on: May 12, 2023
09:57Comprehensive Protocol to Sample and Process Bone Marrow for Measuring Measurable Residual Disease and Leukemic Stem Cells in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Published on: March 5, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Bone Marrow Sampling and Transplants
The transplant begins with high doses of chemotherapy and radiation treatment, which aim to destroy...
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Dopamine Receptor Antagonists
Phenothiazines, such as prochlorperazine...