A study to define and assess severity of institutional abuse/neglect

The purpose of this paper is to examine results of an empirical study of judgments about the seriousness of situations of institutional child maltreatment. This study furthers the development of operational definitions of institutional abuse and neglect by examining the following issues: What is the relative seriousness of institutional child maltreatment events? Are judgments of seriousness made on the basis of caregiver behavior or negative consequences to the child? Are incidents of child maltreatment which occur in institutions judged differently than similar incidents which occur in an intrafamilial context? This paper presents data gathered on judgments made by 630 respondents regarding 24 situations of child maltreatment. Respondents in the study represented: children in care, direct caregivers, managers in institutions, public child welfare workers, facility board members, and foster parents. Respondents judged the situations to be harmful more readily than they judged them to be abuse/neglect. For the majority of events in this survey, the setting (out-of-home care vs. intrafamilial) did not appear to significantly affect the judgments of respondents in their assessment of harm or judgment as abuse/neglect. The presentation of a negative consequence for the child significantly (p less than .05) increased the respondents' assessment of harm in 12 out of 24 events. The presentation of a consequence for the child significantly (p less than .05) increased the respondents' assessment of harm in 12 out of 20 events. The presentation of a consequence for the child significantly (p less than .05) increased the judgment of abuse/neglect in 8 out of 24 events.